Comments on Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Bigger text (+)Smaller text (-)

Comments on Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States. received:

Dear Harmon:

You have a very astute understanding of the law.  Most people do not understand that a purple poka dotted people eater from the swamps of Panama can run for, and be, the presidency of the corporation called THE UNITED STATES.  And Mr. Berg, being a spawn of satan plantation trustee for the slaves who are members of the communitarian welfare benefit satanic religious association plantation [up] in the commercial air with Satan, cannot bring a law issue from the dirt constitution for The United States of America.  I was today going to write a Amicus Curiae brief in support of dismissing the claims of ol'e Esquire Berg for lack of capacity and venue.  I am sooooo  disappointed my name will not go down in history as having correctly ID'ed the law issue.  Oh well, maybe there will be another time for my 15 minutes of notoriety.

God Bless You, my friend. L  -o-

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Legal Reality <[email protected]> wrote:

27 October A.D. 2008

Those who are students of The Terre Haute Litigation fully anticipated this ruling.  Dismissal is the correct ruling.

We can be upset about this, or we can learn the lesson that the trial court is teaching.  There's one and only one way Berg lacks standing, and to come to terms with that reality is to come to terms with a very shocking paradigm shift.  It's the very same paradigm shift the students of The Terre Haute Litigation experienced in coming to terms with that dismissal.  There are just two of several "pure Constitution" cases filed in the past several years.  What most are not aware of is that all "pure Constitution" cases get dismissed.  There's a reason for that!

Both lines of response (being upset or learning the lesson of legal reality) are necessarily unpleasant experiences; however, the first one leads to futility, while the second one leads to the understanding by which we come to understand the legal mechanism of the "federal government" system.

Let's go over this, again.  "Federal" means "federal."  It doesn't mean "national," and it most certainly doesn't mean "constitutional," as proved one more time.  "Federal" means, at the level of a state, "by compact," or "by treaty."  At the level of the individual, it means "by private obligation."

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

Subscribe / unsubscribe:  [email protected]

NOTICE: Lewis Mohr, Harmon L. Taylor are not affiliated with Freedom School.
NOTICE: If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
       Specialty Areas

All the powers in the universe seem to favor the person who has confidence.

More & Other Information - Resource Pages
Admiralty related itemsBelligerent Claimant
BondsAttention Signing the Constitution Away
Citizenship / nationality related itemsEducation
Jerry KirkAware
JurisdictionLaw related items
Lewis MohrLuis Ewing
MoneyOath related items
Reading MaterialReading Room
StuffTax matters
Travel related
Legal RealityVideo
NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank you. Make donation with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!

Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.

Freedom School information served for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for those men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance.

Freedom School is a free speech site and operation as there is no charge for things presented
this site relys on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.
The noteworthy failure of the government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and third parties affiliated or otherwise. If the government wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements that are not factual appearing on this website are in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. §556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification. site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, or work computers´ DMCA Policy

the site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, and/or work computers, make effort to be in compliance with 17 U.S.C. § 512 and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"). It is our policy to respond to any infringement notices and take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") and other applicable intellectual property laws.

If your copyrighted material has been posted on the site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, or work computers, in other than fair use capacity or if links to your copyrighted material are returned through our search engine and you want the material removed, you must provide a written communication that details the information listed in the following section. Please be aware that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys´ fees) if you misrepresent information listed on the site that is allegedly infringing on your alleged copyrights. We suggest that you may want to first contact competent legal assistance on this matter.

The following elements must be included in your copyright infringement claim:

* Provide evidence of the authorized person to act on behalf of the fully disclosed alleged owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. Please notice that we generally do not deal with third parties.
* Provide sufficient contact information so that we may contact you. You must also include a valid email address.
* You must identify in sufficient detail the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed and including at least one search term under which the material appears in search results.
* A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
* A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
* Must be signed by the authorized person to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly being infringed. (Proper ratification of commencement.)

Send the infringement notice via email to the postmaster at

Please allow 1-3 business days for an email response. Note that emailing your complaint to other parties such as our Internet Service Provider (ISP) or server host(s) will not expedite your request and may result in a delayed response due the complaint not being properly being filed.

Presentation Copyright© 2007, 2021
All Rights Reserved