Using the Organic Law to Claim Your Freedom

Bigger text (+)Smaller text (-)

(As received...)

From: [email protected]

Date: March 22, 2020

Subject: Using the Organic Law to Claim Your Freedom


American lawyers and that includes judges have no idea of how the Organic Laws of the United States of America determines the limitations on government and the written law.

If the Organic Laws were better known, America would have a true libertarian government without the necessity of putting the issue to a vote. In fact, government in America was libertarian until George Washington took the oath to be President of the United States on April 30, 1789. From that to the present, America has been ruled by a government that should be limited to the territory owned and ceded to the United States of America. Americans could be free today, if they only knew the difference between the United States created by the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the United States of America created by the Articles of Confederation.

Instead of having freedom, Americans are ruled by Nancy Pelosi and renegade representative government. This sad state of affairs was made possible by Washington, a lot of lawyers and the finagling Founding Fathers.

The British colonies grew into the United States of America owing to the neglect of their isolated locale and the British monarch's preoccupation with other matters. When the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled publish and declare these United Colonies to be FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES, they did so in the Declaration of Independence, the first of the fundamental laws of the United States of America. The careful reader or at least the one who does a word seach of the Declaration of Independence will find a reference to an unwritten Constitution.

Black's Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition, defines organic law as, "The fundamental law, or constitution of a state or nation, written or unwritten; that law or system of laws or principles which defines and establishes the organization of its government."

The Declaration of Independence was the beginning of the end of the British monarchy in the thirteen colonies. This Organic Law declared the United States of America to be free and independent, but it would take a war to make it official.

While the War of the American Revoluntion was being waged the second Organic Law was being circulated for ratification by all the thirteen states. The Articles of Confederation were fully ratified by all thirteen states when Maryland ratified on March 1, 1781.

The British lost the War and concluded a peace in the Treaty of Paris of 1783 in which George III, his Britannic Majesty acknowledged that each of the thirteen United States were free, sovereign and independent. The British lost their claim to the American wilderness and the need for the administration of this vast tract of land necessitated the third Organic Law, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787. An ordinance is local law and though the Articles of Confederation granted no legislative power on the United States, in Congress assembled Congress had proprietary power indistinguishable from legislative power.

The last Organic Law of the United States of America is the document known as the Constitution, although the Articles of Confederation acted as the Constitution for the United States of America. The Constitution of the United States, as it has come to be known is the most devious product of the legal profession.

The Constitution is a boon to government and lawyers because it is a source of endless conflict. There was little to cause conflict in the government above the State level because the United States, in Congress assembled had no power to tax or make laws. George Washington, Alexander Hamilton and the rest of the Founding Fathers would soon create a litigator's paradise by carrying out the greatest bloodless government takeover in the history of the world.

The lawyers of that time led by Alexander Hamilton began to circulate rumors that the Constitutional Convention that began meeting in secret in Philadelphia on May 25,1787 would create a Constitution that would replace the Articles of Confederation. Hamilton was one of the delegates from the State of New York and was the only one that remained after the other two resigned. Hamilton along with George Washington and his cronies continued to feed the lie to the American public that the Constitution of September 17, 1787 replaced the Articles of Confederation.

Alexander Hamilton, George Washington and the rest of the Founding Fathers were so convincing no lawyer today believes the Articles of Confederation is a viable Organic Law. American children today are taught the Constitution of September 17, 1787 replaced the Articles of Confederation. This is what kids are taught without objection on the Internet:

The Continental Congress wrote the Articles of Confederation during the Revolutionary War. The articles were written to give the colonies some sense of a unified government. Once the thirteen colonies became the thirteen states, however, each one began to act alone in its own best interest. A new governing document was needed in order for these new states to act together, to become a nation.

The Articles of Confederation became effective on March 1, 1781, after all thirteen states had ratified them. The Articles made the states and legislature supreme. There was no executive branch. Judicial functions were very limited. The resulting government was weak. Efforts to make it stronger failed. A convention called in May 1787 to re-write the Articles decided to draft an entirely new Constitution. The present disreputable condition of the legal profession and unconscienable state of judicial system in America can be laid directly to the deception of Hamilton, Washington and the Founding Fathers.

The only proof that can be offered to support the claim that the Articles of Confederation have been repealed is the original rumor initiated by Alexander Hamilton. No lawyer has yet shown how the perpetual Union created by Articles of Confederation could be repealed or replaced by the nine States that were necessary, according to Article VII of this Constitution, to ratify this Constitution.

The Articles of Confederation, which were operative only after it had been ratified by all thirteen states, is without question the Constitution for the United States of America. No lawyer knows how it would be possible to maintain the United States of America, if the Articles of Confederation were repealed.

No lawyer has been able to demonstrate how any law, especially Organic Laws, could be repealed without specifically using the clear language of repeal or rescission. The last sentence of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 clearly repeals the prior Ordinance of April 23, 1784.

Americans so trusted George Washington and the Founding Fathers that no one suspected these men to be the scoundrels they are. These men have been above suspicion for so long no one has questioned soundness of the proposition that one Organic Law can re replaced by another.

George Washington is no hero. He and others in the Constitutional Convention hatched a very successful plot to take over a government that was headed for local control by the American people. The sooner that truth is realized the sooner the serious problem of correcting the many errors that have been made, because the fundamental laws upon which government and government law have been misconceived by incompetent lawyers.

What pass for the greatest lawyers of our time are taught the same law that children are being taught. The Constitution of September 17, 1787 did not repeal or replace the Articles of Confederation. You can easily become a legal genius just by trying to prove me wrong. Do your own research. Try to prove with evidence the demise of the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation and the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787. These laws tell the full story and in that telling you are set free.

Do your due diligence and then contact me to become a law student. My e-mail is [email protected]

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

NOTICE: Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera is not affiliated with Freedom School nor is this an endorsement of his offering.
NOTICE: If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
       Specialty Areas

All the powers in the universe seem to favor the person who has confidence.

More & Other Information - Resource Pages
Admiralty related itemsBelligerent Claimant
BondsAttention Signing the Constitution Away
Citizenship / nationality related itemsEducation
Jerry KirkAware
JurisdictionLaw related items
Lewis MohrLuis Ewing
MoneyOath related items
Reading MaterialReading Room
StuffTax matters
Travel related
NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank you. Make donation with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!

Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.

Freedom School information served for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for those men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance.

Freedom School is a free speech site and operation as there is no charge for things presented
this site relys on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.
The noteworthy failure of the government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and third parties affiliated or otherwise. THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC AGREEMENT AND IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT, EQUIVALENT TO A SIGNED, WRITTEN CONTRACT BETWEEN PARTIES - If the government, or any one else, wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements that are not factual appearing on this website are in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. §556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification. site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, or work computers´ DMCA Policy

the site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, and/or work computers, make effort to be in compliance with 17 U.S.C. § 512 and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"). It is our policy to respond to any infringement notices and take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") and other applicable intellectual property laws.

If your copyrighted material has been posted on the site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, or work computers, in other than fair use capacity or if links to your copyrighted material are returned through our search engine and you want the material removed, you must provide a written communication that details the information listed in the following section. Please be aware that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys´ fees) if you misrepresent information listed on the site that is allegedly infringing on your alleged copyrights. We suggest that you may want to first contact competent legal assistance on this matter.

The following elements must be included in your copyright infringement claim:

* Provide evidence of the authorized person to act on behalf of the fully disclosed alleged owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. Please notice that we generally do not deal with third parties.
* Provide sufficient contact information so that we may contact you. You must also include a valid email address.
* You must identify in sufficient detail the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed and including at least one search term under which the material appears in search results.
* A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
* A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
* Must be signed by the authorized person to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly being infringed. (Proper ratification of commencement.)

Send the infringement notice via email to the postmaster at

Please allow 1-3 business days for an email response. Note that emailing your complaint to other parties such as our Internet Service Provider (ISP) or server host(s) will not expedite your request and may result in a delayed response due the complaint not being properly being filed.

Presentation CopyrightŠ 2007, 2020
All Rights Reserved