Private Attorney General
Reveals Role
Exposing Michael Jackson's
Unlicensed Attorney

Bigger text (+)Smaller text (-) received,

From: Supreme Law Firm
Date: Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 4:33 PM
Subject: Private Attorney General Reveals Role Exposing Michael Jackson's Unlicensed Attorney
Recent: Michael Jackson news

Private Attorney General Reveals Role Exposing Michael Jackson's Unlicensed Attorney


San Diego, California. For the first time, a Private Attorney General has revealed key documents which exposed singer Michael Jackson's first defense attorney for lacking the license to practice law required by California State laws.

Paul Andrew Mitchell, well known on the Internet for creating and maintaining a public domain database called the Supreme Law Library, has doggedly pursued The State Bar of California for refusing to obey a federal SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE. That SUBPOENA requires the State Bar to disclose all licenses required of more than 200,000 members, going back ten years, by invoking authority conferred by Civil RICO statutes enacted by Congress: see here

Statutes in the California Business and Professions Code require all State Bar members to indorse a certificate of oath upon their licenses to practice law. Thorough research at Mitchell's law firm has confirmed that a "certificate" legally requires a physical document; and, the required oath binds all Bar members to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of California. There is no such thing as a verbal certificate. see here

Mitchell also revealed publicly, for the first time, that all prosecuting attorneys in the Santa Barbara District Attorney's office likewise turned up without the required licenses. After receiving a series of rude refusals from a middle manager in that office, Mitchell referred evidence of State law violations to the Santa Barbara County Grand Jury, and Board of Supervisors: see here

The evidence implicating Jackson's first attorney, Mark Geragos, in identical violations, was mailed quietly to Jackson's sister, singer Janet Jackson, at a business address in West Los Angeles.

Not long after that correspondence was delivered to Janet Jackson, Michael fired Geragos and hired an out-of-state defense attorney in Thomas Mesereau. Jackson was later acquitted, after a highly publicized trial in a California Superior Court.

In a related investigation, Paul Andrew Mitchell has also recently published a body of evidence implicating numerous federal judges in California with impersonating federal officers -- a federal felony: Commissions   /   Title 18, §912

With extensive assistance from the U.S.Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., Mitchell has named all suspects for lacking one or more of the 4 credentials required of all federal judges: Senate Confirmation, Presidential Commission, Appointment Affidavit and Oath of Office. Commissions   /   Federal Judges

The evidence of impersonation also implicates the same suspects in a criminal conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering, due in part to their frequent acts of mail fraud. Federal law only requires 2 acts of mail fraud to constitute a pattern of racketeering activity during any given 10-year period. Title 18, §1961   /   (5) Private Attorney General

Furthermore, while cross-checking the on-line database of the California State Bar, Mitchell also confirmed that all federal district judges throughout California likewise failed to indorse their licenses to practice law, when they were first admitted to membership in that State Bar organization. A large percentage of Ninth Circuit judges also turned up missing the required licenses; the majority began their careers in other States, however.

Three U.S.Supreme Court Justices also began their law practices in California, and all three have also turned up without the licenses required by that State Bar Act, which is a subset of the California Business and Professions Code. Breyer   /   Kennedy   /   O'Connor

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor recently retired from the high Court.

Prior to finding that these three Justices were lacking licenses, the U.S. DOJ confirmed that another three Justices do not have Presidential Commissions in DOJ's custody. The U.S. DOJ is the designated legal custodian, and thus obligated to produce those Commissions in response to Mitchell's Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") requests for same: Breyer   /   Ruth Ginsburg   /   Clarence Thomas

Mitchell submitted FOIA requests for these missing credentials when his copyright and trademark infringement case reached the U.S.Supreme Court in recent years: read here

Further details are available, free of charge, in the many documents now available in the Supreme Law Library here:

# # #

NOTICE: Paul Andrew Mitchell is not affiliated with Freedom School.
NOTICE: If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
       Specialty Areas

All the powers in the universe seem to favor the person who has confidence.

More & Other Information - Resource Pages
Admiralty related itemsBelligerent Claimant
BondsAttention Signing the Constitution Away
Citizenship / nationality related itemsEducation
Jerry KirkAware
JurisdictionLaw related items
Lewis MohrLuis Ewing
MoneyOath related items
Reading MaterialReading Room
StuffTax matters
Travel related
NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank you. Make donation with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!

Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
This enterprise collectively is known and generaly presented as "" - "we," "us" or "our" are other expressions of used throughout.

This is the fine print that so important. Freedom School and other information served is so for educational purposes only, no liability expressed or assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to or condone unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all Law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for [those] men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance. Support is not offered.

Freedom School is a free speech site, non-commecial enterprise and operation as there is no charge for things presented
this site relys on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.
The noteworthy failure of [the] government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and any and all [third] parties affiliated or otherwise. THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC AGREEMENT AND IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT, EQUIVALENT TO A SIGNED, WRITTEN CONTRACT BETWEEN PARTIES - If the government, or anyone else, wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements appearing on this website are not factual or otherwise in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. §556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification. is not responsible for content of any linked website or material.
In addition, users may not use to engage in, facilitate or further unlawful conduct; use the service in a way that harms us or anyone connected with or whose work is presented; damage, disable, overburden, or impair the service (or the network(s) connected to the site) or interfere with anyone's use and enjoyment of the website.
All claims to be settled on the land - Austin, Travis county Texas, united States of America, using Texas Common Law.
All parts of this contract apply to the maximum extent permitted by law. A court may hold that we cannot enforce a part of this contract as written. If this happens, then you and we will replace that part with terms that most closely match the intent of the part that we cannot enforce. The rest of this contract will not change. This is the entire contract between you and us regarding your use of the service. It supersedes any prior contract or statements regarding your use of the site. If there exists some manner of thing missing we do not forfeit our right to that thing as we reserve all rights.
We may assign, or modify, alter, change this contract, in whole or in part, at any time with or without notice to you. You may not assign this contract, or any part of it, to any other person. Any attempt by you to do so is void. You may not transfer to anyone else, either temporarily or permanently, any rights to use the site or material contained within.

Presentation CopyrightŠ 2007, 2023
All Rights Reserved