by Russell D. Longcore
Special to L. Neil Smith´s The Libertarian Enterprise
I don´t think I´ve ever seen an expansive article about unalienable
rights. We all seem to just refer to the Declaration of Independence
and what Jefferson wrote, and then defer to it. But natural law and
unalienable rights are where it all starts.
Thomas Jefferson wrote: "We hold these truths to be
self-evident, that all men are created equal, and are endowed
by their Creator with certain Unalienable Rights... " Self-Evident.
Obvious. Perhaps it was self-evident to the 18th Century common man,
but I submit to you that the common 21st Century mind is not equally
equipped. Much of the wisdom of the ages has been withheld from the
modern man by the government schools. And why not? If you are a
government, both tasked by The People to educate them and controlled
by the same People, why teach generation after generation how to
control you? Why not teach those generations how to be
controlled? Self-evident truths bow to governmental
Building a tower requires building a firm foundation FIRST... or your
tower goes over when the winds blow hard. Gentle readers, we´re in a
CAT 5 hurricane right now that´s going to take down our American
tower. If you do not have a working understanding of unalienable
rights, you´ll likely fall for the next iteration of oppressive,
tyrannical government foisted upon an uneducated populace who move
their lips when they read. And if you don´t truly understand this
philosophy, you cannot possibly teach it to your young.
Unalienable rights are also known as Natural Law or Absolute Rights.
In this article these terms will be interchangeable. Also, the use of
a male pronoun or the word "man" means all humans.
We begin with a definition of "Unalienable:"
"Unalienable: incapable of being alienated, that is, sold and
transferred." Black´s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page
1523. One cannot sell, transfer or surrender unalienable rights.
The Creator bestowed them on every individual. All human beings
possess unalienable rights. Unalienable rights cannot be taken nor
surrendered but they can be simply ignored. This is a little like the
story Jesus told about the prodigal son. A recalcitrant son learns
through tough lessons that he cannot escape his father´s love nor his
rights as his father´s son.
But can we find natural human rights without a recognition of a
Creator? Yes, without a doubt. What you´ll learn here about Natural
Law dwells in the heart of every human being simply because he
exists. The concept of Unalienable Rights is life-affirming whether
or not you believe in a Higher Power, since the concept showcases the
uniqueness of the human being in this world. Unalienable Rights are
the highest form of humanness while at the same time the most
elementary of man´s characteristics.
Unalienable or Inalienable?
There is a very serious error made throughout America as related to
Unalienable Rights. That is, that many people use the term
"Inalienable Rights" and think that the terms are
interchangeable. But they are as different as night and day.
Inalienable Rights: Rights which are not capable of
being surrendered or transferred without the consent of the one
possessing such rights. Morrison v. State, Mo. App., 252
S.W.2d 97, 101.
Inalienable rights can be transferred, sold or surrendered if you
give your consent. Inalienable rights are not bestowed by the Creator
or inherent in humans. "Persons" have inalienable rights, and
the word "Person" is a legal term1.
Inalienable rights can be bestowed to persons by government, and can
be likewise removed from persons by government. At times, government
itself can be considered a "Person" in a legal sense. Most state
constitutions recognize only inalienable rights.
Therefore, because we possess Unalienable Rights, endowed by
our Creator, to secure these rights(not grant or create
them), "Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just
powers from the consent of the governed."2 And the rights we bestow upon government are
the Inalienable Rights that we all possess that can be
transferred to other persons.
We´re going to build this like a pyramid, much like the Hierarchy of
Needs developed by Professor Abraham Maslow, Ph.D. He placed the
bedrock human needs as the base of the pyramid, these being the most
fundamental needs upon which all others are built. Physiological
needs are first, simple survival of the human body. Next up comes
Safety, then Love, Esteem, then Self-actualization as the headstone.
Maslow´s Hierarchy of Needs Graphic
I don´t have a cool graphic for Unalienable Rights, so you´ll just
have to look at Maslow´s pyramid and use your imagination. It won´t
be all that hard.
The Right of Life
When Thomas Jefferson wrote of "certain Unalienable Rights," he
placed them in the proper order, with Life being the first and most
basic of all. This is the right to simply exist as a sentient
being... one able to perceive sensations, a consciousness. Unalienable
rights come into being at the moment that a human becomes a human. I
do not mean when the individual becomes a viable human, capable of
life outside the womb. Both sides of the abortion issue agree that a
zygote... a human female egg fertilized by a male sperm... is human, and
that every day after it becomes an embryo for about 270 days it is
human. Our right to life means our right to express our humanness and
to simply be alive. The opposite is the death of a human
being. The right to life gets very complicated, since none of us were
able to leave the womb and live without assistance, sustenance and
support. An argument about embryonic viability here entirely misses
the point, since even post-birth humans need daily care until at
least age 5 (or 10) or they will likely die. So along with our own
innate right to life, we acknowledge our responsibility to assist
other human life to exist and express itself. Maslow pointed to the
need of breathing, food, water, sleep, sex, homeostasis and
excretion... all part of maintaining life, and without any one of those
needs, life would eventually stop. Note here that the right of life
is seldom exercised individually, but is inextricably tied to the
lives of others.
Right of Personal Security
The next step up the Unalienable Rights pyramid is the right to
protect one´s very life and bodily existence. And by acknowledging
the duties we have to others to whom we give life... our progeny... we
extend the right to protect their lives also. Personal security first
means that our bodies are safe from harm. That security encompasses
both protection by others while we are unable to secure our
own safety and protecting ourselves and our loved ones after
we become capable of assuring our own safety. Note here that the
right of personal security is seldom exercised individually, but is
inextricably tied to the safety of others. The Second Amendment has
its foundation in this unalienable human right, relying upon it to
secure a free state through the use of a militia. The Second
Amendment is not the "right" to keep and bear arms. It is the
restriction on Congress to violate the Unalienable Right of Personal
Security. Both the 4th, 5th and 14th Amendments were supposed to
secure this Right.
The Right of Labor
The first manifestation of the greater Right of Property is found in
the Right of Labor. Every human being owns the work of his own mind
and hands, and any hindrance to his employing his mental and physical
ability in whatever method he thinks proper, without causing injury
to another individual, would be a violation of the Right of Labor.
This right will be found in Maslow´s Safety block.
Right to Acquire and Enjoy Property
"Without property rights, no other rights are possible. Since man
has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right
to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life. The
man who produces while others dispose of his product is a slave." Ayn
Rand, The Virtue of Selfishness
This Right touches all of the other Unalienable Rights. First, a
human fully possesses his own body, and may do with it what he
pleases, as long as his choices do not violate the property rights of
another human. Next, man owns his labor and may use his labor for his
own subsistence. He may use his labor as an expression of value or a
medium of exchange, and may freely exchange that value to acquire
property. Then he may have quiet enjoyment of his property according
to any manner that best reflects his happiness. Property may take the
form of physical assets, but may also be less tangible assets like
intellectual property. Property rights mean ownership and control,
which includes the right to use an asset as well as the right to
prohibit others from using the asset. Property rights also allow the
owner to determine the value of an asset, and to even destroy an
asset if he so chooses. The only restriction on the Unalienable Right
of Property is that it does not infringe upon the Unalienable Rights
As John Locke stated in The Second Treatise on Government
(1690) "The great and chief end therefore of men uniting into
commonwealths, and putting themselves under government, is the
preservation of property." What man would willingly join a society
that did not protect his enjoyment of the fruits of his own labor?
In The Wealth of Nations (1776), Adam Smith states that
"private property created a role for government in defending property
(rights), and the existence of government created the security to
stimulate the creation of new property." Many today wonder why the
economies of the nations are in such dreadful shape. But most
governments around the world are undermining property rights, the
very reason for their existence. When there is no predictability in
the marketplace, and individuals are preyed upon by governments, the
incentive for creating new property is diminished or altogether
extinguished. Those still seeking to create new property will migrate
to the governments that best protect property rights. That´s why
capital is leaving America for foreign locations and will continue to
Right to Contract
This Unalienable Right gives all individuals the liberty to
voluntarily enter into contract with any other individual or group of
individuals, so long as there is agreement as to the terms of the
contract by all parties involved, and so long as the contractual
agreement does not violate another individual´s Unalienable Rights.
Therefore, in light of property rights, individuals may sell their
labor to an employer at mutually agreeable terms. Individuals may
profit from the disposition of other property by mutual agreement.
All Unalienable Rights preceded the establishment of governments.
However, governments chafe mightily under this Right. In America, the
years 1897 to 1937 were a 40-year period in which the US Supreme
Court vigorously protected the Right to Contract. This period of time
is called the "Lochner years," referring to Lochner v. New York
(1905). In Lochner, the High Court struck down a New York
statute that set maximum working hours. Justice Rufus Peckham,
writing for the majority, stated that the Due Process Clauses found
in the 5th and 14th Amendments were stout enough to protect the
Unalienable Right to Contract, and that the State of New York had no
business restricting the hours that an employee and employer may
agree to. After 1937, the Court has relentlessly attacked the Right
to Contract, supporting laws like the minimum wage and child labor
statutes. Most of the burdensome Federal regulations are attacks on
the Right to Contract, since they require parties to contracts to
perform acts that they would likely not agree to if given a choice.
Right of Free Speech
This is the freedom to speak freely, provided that your speech does
not violate the free speech of other individuals. The Right of Free
Speech is an absolute right, subject to no other restrictions than
another individual´s Unalienable Rights. Naturally, your liberty to
speak does not allow for libel, slander, fraud or falsehood. This is
another Unalienable Right which governments despise, and most
governments do not allow untrammeled free speech. And free speech may
take many forms, such as spoken, written, printed and performed.
Right of Beliefs or Conscience
Individuals have an Unalienable Right to believe what they wish, to
worship as their conscience dictates, or as a negative right, to not
believe or not worship as their conscience dictates.
Right of Personal Liberty
The classical liberal (the good kind) concept of personal liberty is
as a moral principle in which an individual is free to govern
himself, his life and his property without outside compulsion, force
or fraud, provided that his personal governance does not intrude upon
or violate the liberty of another individual.
Right to the Pursuit of Happiness
"Striving to find meaning in one´s life is the primary
motivational force in man." -Dr. Viktor Frankl, 1992
The Pursuit of Happiness provides the vehicle through which man can
find life´s meaning.
The Pursuit of Happiness would be found on Maslow´s pyramid at the
very top as a Self-Actualization need. But this Right encapsulates
all the other Rights and cannot be accomplished until the other
Unalienable Rights are in place and utilized. Your pursuit of
happiness would be short-circuited if you do not enjoy the Rights to
Life, Labor, Property, Contract, Belief and Liberty.
To understand how this phrase "the pursuit of happiness" found its
way into the Declaration of Independence, you must know some
background about Thomas Jefferson. He was strongly influenced by the
Greek philosopher Epicurus, even referring to himself as an
Epicurean. The teacher´s philosophy was simple: if you cultivated
close friendships, limited your desires to the essential necessities
of life, and rejoiced in the moment, happiness was yours to keep.
Everything in moderation.
Think about a Being that creates humans, then endows them with
Unalienable Rights simply because they are human, and the pinnacle of
their Rights being the Right to the Pursuit of Happiness! Not its
attainment, but the pursuit. The Creator is no cosmic Joker, playing
a cynical game by creating a desire in the breast of each human being
for happiness, but having no available tools to meet the desire. We
are endowed with the desire, the ability and the Unalienable Rights
necessary to live a life of purpose and meaning, and to pass on those
purposes and those meanings to subsequent generations, all seeking
the same outcomes.
Share this article with those you love. Then discuss it. Teach your
children these lessons so they understand how the Creator meant for
them to live. Understanding your Unalienable Rights will give you a
reason to live, a gratefulness to your Creator, and true self-esteem based in reality.
1 The Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson, 1776.
2 PERSON. This word is applied to men, women and
children, who are called natural persons. In law, man and person are
not exactly synonymous terms. Any human being is a man, whether he be
a member of society or not, whatever may be the rank he holds, or
whatever may be his age, sex, &c. A person is a man considered
according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to
which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it
imposes. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 137.
2. It is also used to denote a corporation
which is an artificial person. 1 Bl. Com. 123; 4 Bing. 669; C. 33
Eng. C. L R. 488; Woodes. Lect. 116; Bac. Us. 57; 1 Mod. 164.
3. But when the word "Persons" is spoken of in legislative
acts, natural persons will be intended, unless something appear in
the context to show that it applies to artificial persons. 1 Scam. R. 178.
4. Natural persons are divided into males, or men; and
females or women. Men are capable of all kinds of engagements and
functions, unless by reasons applying to particular individuals.
Women cannot be appointed to any public office, nor perform any civil
functions, except those which the law specially declares them capable
of exercising. Civ. Code of Louis. art. 25.
5. They are also sometimes divided into free persons and
slaves. Freemen are those who have preserved their natural liberty,
that is to say, who have the right of doing what is not forbidden by
the law. A slave is one who is in the power of a master to whom he
belongs. Slaves are sometimes ranked not with persons but things. But
sometimes they are considered as persons for example, a negro is in
contemplation of law a person, so as to be capable of committing a
riot in conjunction with white men. 1 Bay, 358. Vide Man.
6. Persons are also divided into citizens, (q.v.) and
aliens, (q.v.) when viewed with regard to their political rights.
When they are considered in relation to their civil rights, they are
living or civilly dead; vide Civil Death; outlaws; and infamous
7. Persons are divided into legitimates and bastards, when
examined as to their rights by birth.
8. When viewed in their domestic relations, they are divided
into parents and children; husbands and wives; guardians and wards;
and masters and servants son, as it is understood in law, see 1
Toull. n. 168; 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 1890, note.
-A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution
and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.
© Copyright 2023, Russell D. Longcore. Permission to reprint
in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Russell D. Longcore is an insurance claims consultant based in
Marietta, Georgia. He is the author of the hot-selling book,
"Insurance Claim Secrets REVEALED!" which has been a Number
One book at Amazon continuously since October 2007. His second
book, "Commercial Insurance Claim Secrets REVEALED!" has just been released in Ebook format.
Russell also owns www.InsuranceQuoteHQ.com, an insurance quote
service offering competitive insurance quotes for every kind
of insurance imaginable. What sets this website apart from all
other quote sites is that Russell also shows consumers how to
take control of their insurance claims and add hundreds or
even thousands more dollars to their claim settlements.
Russ can be reached at: firstname.lastname@example.org