Social Security: Mark of the Beast!

Bigger text (+)Smaller text (-)
Translate this Page!

mobpreviousbutton.jpg (2648 bytes) mobnextbutton.jpg (2403 bytes) mobtablebutton.jpg (3326 bytes)

 

Chapter 8

WHO CAN QUALIFY FOR A SOCIAL SECURITY CARD?

You will find conflicting answers to this important question.

The official US Government answer is that only welfare applicants may get a Social Security Number. 

Since welfare remains unconstitutional within the Unites states, the only welfare available is foreign welfare.  Your federal government administers this foreign program.  Social Security came into existence in 1936, three years after the federal government went bankrupt.  The foreign bankruptcy receivership offers this welfare plan for destitute people who volunteer to become their permanent wards.  The original intent was to get the ownership of American’s labor (people don’t like it when I use the word “slave”) to put up as collateral for the national debt.  Those who survived the Great Depression were grateful for the indentured servitude that allowed them to survive.  Are you?

If you persist in your inquiry, you will get many answers.  I’ve collected many different pamphlets and IRS publications and responses to letters.  These are all unofficial.  In my Appendix G you will learn what the courts think about unofficial answers:

"... One who relies on a legal interpretation by a government official assumes the risk that it is in error... it has also been held or said that `the government could scarcely function if it were bound by its employees unauthorized representations'"

"Informal publications of IRS all the way up to revenue rulings are simply guides to taxpayers and taxpayer relies on them at his peril."

"... Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority ... and this is so even though, as here, the agent himself may have been unaware of the limitations upon his authority."

The official answers are from the law, regulations, court cases and official notices. 

COURT CASES.  In the last chapter you were introduced to the six court cases that forced people to get Social Security Numbers.  All six were welfare recipients.

THE LAW.  There is no government requirement for anyone to apply for a number.  SSNs cannot be assigned unless you first apply for socialist benefits.  Section 205(c)(2)(B)(i) of the Social Security Act  allows the Social Security Administration to assign numbers

"to any individual who is an applicant for or recipient of benefits under any program financed in whole or in part from Federal funds including any child on whose behalf such benefits are claimed by another person..." 

Read that again.  Do you meet the eligibility requirements for a Social Security Number?  It is available ONLY to those who claim government funds (Later I will prove that it is not even your government).  Only those who need benefits can receive a Social Security Number.  Social Security is not a trust fund, nor insurance, nor a pension; it’s a handout.  A Christian cannot associate with freeloaders per 2nd Thessalonians 3:6 -14 .  If you ask them to take care of you, then you are asking to become a ward of a foreign authority. TO GET BENEFITS, YOU MUST BECOME A WARD OF A FOREIGN AUTHORITY.  For constitutional reasons, they can give welfare ONLY to these wards.  James Madison said it “is an absurdity” to state that welfare can be given to ordinary people.  A pauper is someone who is supported at public expense.  As you’ve seen from the Articles of Confederation, a pauper cannot have rights.  Never did, never will.  You, like Esau, gave up your birthright for a future bowl of stew. 

The only other categories of people who can be given a SSN are aliens applying for federal citizenship, and students enrolling in federally funded schools.  [even though the Supreme Court in a 1982 case Plyler v. Doe, 457 US 202 , says that schools cannot require SSNs from students].

THE REGULATION. 

Title 20, Code of Federal Regulations, section 422.103:

“(b)Applying for a number. (1) Form SS-5.  An individual needing a social security number may apply for one by filing a signed Form SS-5 ‘Application for a Social Security Card’, at any social security office and submitting the required evidence.....

(2) Request on birth registration document.  Where a parent has requested a social security number for a newborn child as part of an official birth registration process....

That’s right.  Individuals needing a number.  Voluntarily.  The only way they can tell if an indigent is needy enough to sell all his rights for a future bowl of stew is to wait until he asks.  Notice that the term “needing” is not the term “wanting.”  This is entirely consistent with the poor laws. 

OFFICIAL NOTICES

The Paperwork reduction Act (Public Law 96-511)  requires all federal forms that request information from the public to display an OMB number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget.  Title 44, US Code, section 3507(f), prohibits government agencies from collecting any information unless the form displays an OMB number.  To get an OMB number for the form Application for a Social Security Card, Form SS-5 , the agency that created the application form (Treasury Department, not the Social Security Administration) had to file a form SF83 with the OMB.  I have a copy of this SF83.  The Standard Form 83’s section 24 is entitled “Respondents obligation to comply” and then has three boxes to check: “Mandatory”, “Voluntary”, or “Required to obtain or retain a benefit”.  Their SF83 confirms that the SS-5 Application for a SSN is required to obtain a benefit and is not mandatory.  And the form SS-5’s “Legal authority for information collection” is Section 205(c)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act, which I’ve quoted above. 

The Privacy Act (Title 5, US Code, section 552a) in subsection (e)(3) requires all federal forms that solicit information from the public to state what law authorizes the solicitation and whether or not disclosure of the information is mandatory or voluntary.  The Application for a Social Security Card, Form SS-5, has a Privacy Act statement.  It states in part: “You do not have to give us these facts, but without them we cannot issue you a Social Security number or card.  Without a number, you could lose Social Security benefits in the future...”

The laws, regulations and court decisions and official notices are entirely consistent with each other.  They conform with history and with the constitution and with the truth.  And they are entirely consistent with the poor laws. 

People v. Shirley, 92 ALR 2d 413, indexed under the topic Poor Laws:

“The provisions of the welfare code are to be administered fairly, with due consideration not only for the needs of applicants but also for the safeguarding of public funds; if children are not in need, they are not eligible for assistance regardless of who is paying for their support.”

Taxpayers don't need a Social Security Number.  Those who file a Form 1040 for the first time and don't put down a TIN will be assigned a TIN by the IRS.  But beware, the payment of a tax not owed creates an obligation to pay future taxes.

I have yet to confirm that religious objectors who work for the government can get a temporary ITIN instead of an SSN by filling out a W7 form.  On the other hand, I've read where ITINs/IRSNs only apply to Amish objectors per section 1402(g) of the Internal Revenue Code (mentioned in the Legislative History of Public Law 99-514 section 4), and I've also read Revenue Ruling 85-61 which makes it seem that only alien limited partners qualify for these alternate numbers.

The instructions for ITIN application (Form W7) state that the form is only for those who do not qualify for a Social Security Number. 

Here are some notes that lead me to believe that Legal Notice has to be served, by a process server, on anyone required to get a Social Security Number.

US Supreme Court in US v. Batchelder, 442 US 114: 

"Due process requires that a person be given fair notice as to what constitutes illegal conduct, so that he may conform his conduct to the requirements of the law."

Service of notice requiring TINs is acknowledged by 26 CFR 422.6109-1(h):

"... Nothing contained in the regulations under section 6109 shall limit the authority of the Internal Revenue Service to obtain taxpayer identifying numbers required before or after the effective date of this paragraph after notice is served upon the taxpayer pursuant to section 6001."

Now take a closer look at this section 6001 of the Internal Revenue Code.  It uses the deceptive terminology "may require" and "or by regulations":

"... Whenever in the judgment of the Secretary it is necessary, he may require any person, by notice served upon such person or by regulations, to make such returns, render such statements, or keep such records, as the Secretary deems sufficient to show whether or not such person is liable for tax under this title."

Concerning the "or by regulations" terminology: This is one of the places where the word “or” really means “and”.  If you are going to claim that some people are served notice in person, while others are served notice via the publication of regulations, then I demand the equal protection of the law, equal with those who have been served notice in person.  [In statutes the word `or' can mean `and' unless preceded by a comma.  Also see Appendix B where `must' can mean `may']. 

Concerning the “may require” terminology here is proof that "may require" really means "must require".  Note how "may" is defined in 34 AmJur, Mandamus, section 72:

"Frequently, however, the word 'may' or the like as used in statutes relating to the duty of public officers is construed as mandatory, and not merely permissive, Anno: 6 L.R.A. 162; 12 L.R.A.(NS) 340, See STATUTES (also 25 RCL p. 750), and when such is the case, mandamus may issue to compel the officer to perform the duty so imposed.  Rock Island County v. United States, 4 Wall. (US) 435, 18 LEd,419 ; Brokaw v. Highway Comrs., 130 Ill482, 22 N.E. 596, 6 L.R.A. 161 ."

US Supreme Court in Mahler v. Eby, 264 US 32:

"It is essential that where an executive is exercising delegated legislative power he should substantially comply with all the statutory requirements in its exercise"

Isaiah 50:1 (KJV)   "...Behold, for your iniquities have ye sold yourselves...."

mobpreviousbutton.jpg (2648 bytes) mobnextbutton.jpg (2403 bytes) mobbeginning.jpg (2403 bytes) mobtablebutton.jpg (3326 bytes)

NOTICE: Steven Dudley Miller, editor, is not affiliated with Freedom School.
NOTICE: If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
       Specialty Areas

All the powers in the universe seem to favor the person who has confidence.
Share/Save/BookmarkSubscribe

More & Other Information - Resource Pages
Admiralty related items Belligerent Claimant
BondsAttention Signing the Constitution Away
Citizenship / nationality related itemsEducation
GraphicsHistory
Jerry KirkAware
JurisdictionLaw related items
Lewis MohrLuis Ewing
MoneyOath related items
Reading MaterialReading Room
StuffTax matters
Travel related
AntiShyster MagazineVideo
NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank you. Make donation with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!

Freedom-School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
This enterprise collectively is known and generally presented as "Freedom-School.com" - "we," "us" or "our" are other expressions of Freedom-School.com used throughout. "You" is in reference to the user / visitor.

This is the fine print that so important. Freedom School and other information served is so for educational purposes only, no liability expressed or assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to or condone unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and
defend all Law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for [those] men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance. Support is not offered.

Freedom School is a free speech site, non-commercial enterprise and operation as
there is no charge for things presented.
Freedom-School.com site relies on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.

The noteworthy failure of [the] government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and any and all [third] parties affiliated or otherwise. THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC AGREEMENT AND IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT, EQUIVALENT TO A SIGNED, WRITTEN CONTRACT BETWEEN PARTIES - If the government, or anyone else, wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements appearing on this website are not factual or otherwise in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. § 556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.

Freedom-School.com is not responsible for content of any linked website or material.
In addition, users may not use Freedom-School.com to engage in, facilitate or further unlawful conduct;
use the service in any way, or manner, that harms us or anyone connected with us or whose work is presented;
damage, disable, overburden, or impair the service (or the network(s) connected to the site)
or interfere with anyone's use and enjoyment of the website.

All claims to be settled on the land - Austin, Travis county Texas, united States of America, using Texas Common Law.
All parts of this contract apply to the maximum extent permitted by law. A court may hold that we cannot enforce a part of this contract as written. If this happens, then you and we will replace that part with terms that most closely match the intent of the part that we cannot enforce. The rest of this contract will not change. This is the entire contract between you and us regarding your use of the service. It supersedes any prior contract or statements regarding your use of the Freedom-School.com site. If there exists some manner of thing missing we do not forfeit our right to that thing as
we reserve all rights.
We may assign, or modify, alter, change this contract, in whole or in part, at any time with or without notice to you. You may not assign this contract, or any part of it, to any other person. Any attempt by you to do so is void. You may not transfer to anyone else, either temporarily or permanently, any rights to use the Freedom-School.com site or material contained within.

GOOGLE ANALYTICS: While we do not automatically collect personally identifiable information about you when you visit the Freedom-School.com site, we do collect non-identifying and aggregate information that we use to improve our Web site design and our online presence.
Visitors to this site who have Javascript enabled are tracked using Google Analytics. The type of information that Google Analytics collects about you includes data like: the type of Web browser you are using; the type of operating system you are using; your screen resolution; the version of Flash you may be using; your network location and IP address (this can include geographic data like the country, city and state you are in); your Internet connection speed; the time of your visit to the Freedom-School.com site; the pages you visit on the Freedom-School.com site; the amount of time you spend on each page of the Freedom-School.com site and referring site information. In addition to the reports we receive using Google Analytics data, the data is shared with Google. For more information on Google's privacy policies, visit: www.google.com/privacy_ads.html
Here is Google´s description of how Google Analytics works and how you can disable it: "Google Analytics collects information anonymously, and much like examining footprints in sand, it reports website trends without identifying individual visitors. Analytics uses its own cookie to track visitor interactions. The cookie is used to store information, such as what time the current visit occurred, whether the visitor has been to the site before, and what site referred the visitor to the web page. Google Analytics customers can view a variety of reports about how visitors interact with their website so they can improve their website and how people find it. A different cookie is used for each website, and visitors are not tracked across multiple sites. Analytics requires that all websites that use it must update their privacy policy to include a notice that fully discloses the use of Analytics. To disable this type of cookie, some browsers will indicate when a cookie is being sent and allow you to decline cookies on a case-by-case basis."


Presentation Copyright© 2007, 2018
All Rights Reserved

H O M E