Social Security: Mark of the Beast!

Bigger text (+)Smaller text (-)
Translate this Page!

mobpreviousbutton.jpg (2648 bytes) mobnextbutton.jpg (2403 bytes) mobtablebutton.jpg (3326 bytes)


Chapter 6


In the past chapter, I’ve provided proof that Social Security would be unconstitutional if it was a trust fund.  In another chapter I’ll prove that it is only available to indigents, but first I’ll explain why, so that you will understand that IT CANNOT BE OTHERWISE.

Your Constitution does not allow government to provide ordinary people with entitlements such as welfare or Social Security benefits.  It is not a government function to provide entitlements to people.  It is not a government function to take care of people.  Nor is there any authorized source of funds to take care of people, nor can civil servants receive a paycheck for performing such non-governmental services.  And indeed, your Government does not give entitlements to ordinary people.  ORDINARY PEOPLE CANNOT QUALIFY FOR FEDERAL BENEFITS.  Again:  it is not a government function to provide entitlements to people. 

When your Constitution was being considered for ratification by the State Senates, some people were suspicious of the "general welfare" clause and tried to claim that these two words could authorize any kind of welfare.  The general welfare clause in Article 1, Section 8 of your Constitution reads: “The Congress shall have Power to ... provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States;...”  It is an introductory phrase which is followed, after a semi-colon, by a specific list of the 17 things the new government would be authorized to do, such as; to establish post offices, coin money, make treaties, establish standard weights and measures, provide for a Navy, punish pirates, punish counterfeiting, fund a temporary army, declare war, and exercise exclusive jurisdiction over all cases in the future District of Columbia., etc.   

To counter those rumors that the general welfare clause in the proposed Constitution would authorize any kind of welfare, James Madison, in Federalist Paper #41, explained its clear intent.  He stated that it "is an absurdity" to claim that the General Welfare clause confounds or misleads, because this introductory clause is followed by enumeration of specific particulars that explain and qualify the meaning of phrase "general welfare".   

That's right!  YOUR CONSTITUTION WAS RATIFIED UNDER THE ASSURANCE THAT IT WOULD NEVER BE INTERPRETED TO PROVIDE WELFARE TO INDIVIDUALS.  And it has not.  And indeed, to this very day, your US government can not and does not provide entitlements to ordinary Americans.  Here is the catch: The ONLY way to qualify for entitlements, such as welfare or Social Security, is to become a ward of a foreign authority.  The US government administers their program as their agent.  SOCIAL SECURITY AND WELFARE REMAIN CONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE ORDINARY AMERICANS CANNOT QUALIFY FOR ENTITLEMENTS.  The Supreme Court says, 92 US 551:         "It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both.  The citizen cannot complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of government."  

Congress cannot appropriate funds for entitlements to Americans.  No one who swears an oath to uphold the Constitution can lawfully spend funds for any entitlement.  Government funds can only be spent for legitimate purposes.  Examples:

In 1792 President James Madison vetoed a congressional appropriation to assist refugees.  He said:

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”

President Franklin Pierce in 1854 vetoed a bill to help the mentally ill.  He said “I cannot find any authority in the Constitution for public charity.... [this] would be contrary to the letter and the spirit of the Constitution and subversive to the whole theory upon which the Union of these States is founded.”

In 1897, President Grover Cleveland vetoed an appropriation to provide disaster aid to victims of a Texas drought.  His veto stated: "I feel obliged to withhold my approval of the plan to indulge in benevolent and charitable sentiment through the appropriation of public funds... I find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution.  The lesson should be constantly enforced that though the people should support the government, the government should not support the people."


Conclusion #1, welfare is prohibited by your constitution.  IT HAS NEVER BEEN A GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTION TO HELP PEOPLE

Jesus Christ said in Luke 22 :25 : "... they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors.”  2ND Thessalonians 3:6-14  prohibits Christians from associating with freeloaders. 

Those who manage themselves will not accept socialist benefits.  Christians will not force others to pay for their retirement.  Those who accept benefits do so only by a pledge of allegiance to a worldly master.  Perhaps you’ve chosen the wrong provider.  

Another interesting document is President Cleveland's June 21, 1886 veto of military pensions.  His veto blasted into politicians because a pension would "urge honest men to become dishonest."  And he refused to pass such a "demoralizing lesson".  Military pensions were dishonest in 1886.  Federal pensions are still dishonest today.  If earned pensions are dishonest, how depraved are those who think of unearned welfare as honest?

Conclusion #2, pensions are prohibited by your constitution.

By the way, The Federalist Papers are not just some antiquated editorial opinions, they are, according to the Supreme Court in Cohen v. Virginia (6 Wheat), the exact record of the intent of the Constitution (also see Coleman v. Miller).

Just in case you think a law or an amendment changed the intent of your Constitution, Think again.  A congressman cannot swear an oath to support and defend your constitution and then suggest an amendment to change something that he is sworn to perpetuate.  

If you don't believe me, perhaps you can believe the U.S. Supreme Court in S. Carolina v. US, 199 US 437 (1905):

"The Constitution is a written instrument.  As such, its meaning does not alter.  That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now..." 

Busser v. Snyder, 37 ALR 1515:

“An Old Age Assistance Law is prohibited by a constitutional provision that no appropriation shall be made for charitable or benevolent purposes to any person.”

Conclusion #3, Old Age Assistance is prohibited by your constitution. 

Also in the Busser case:

“The term ‘poor,’ as used by lawmakers, describes those who are destitute and helpless, unable to support themselves, and without means of support.”

I want you to remember the legal definition of the term “poor” from this Busser case.  Destitute, helpless, unable to support themselves, without means of support.  Later on, I will show that this is entirely consistent with the poor laws.  If you cannot take care of yourself, others are allowed to take care of you, even if you don’t like it.  John 21:18.  Hint: since Social Security is only available to those who need federal benefits, your confession is sufficient to prove that you cannot take care of yourself. 

Your constitution has not changed.  WELFARE, PENSIONS AND OLD AGE ASSISTANCE REMAIN UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  Such things are not within the realm of the United states government, they must remain foreign.  The only way to get such assistance is to become a ward of a foreign authority.  The US Secretary of the Treasury, as the agent of your foreign masters, will administer the foreign program with “actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken...” pursuant to Title 12 United States Code, section 95(b) .  The Secretary of the Treasury is the very same multinational authority that issues Social Security Cards. 

Yet social security and welfare remain legal.  Here is a history of what is really going on:

The funds for social security, welfare, housing, disaster relief, and now terrorist attack relief, come from the foreign authorities who loan us the national debt.  These funds are not delegated by Congress, but by treaties and trusts administered by the President.  In 1933, the US government was threatened by financial emergencies that threatened legitimate constitutional duties.  Instead of resorting to direct taxes to collect funds, as was allowed by the Constitution, it went bankrupt.  When the government declared bankruptcy in 1933, it was put under the control of a receivership governed by its creditors.  The government provided a (still ongoing) public emergency to administer foreign funds borrowed from the receivership. The US has a duty to secure the assets and income of the federal government as collateral for its creditors.  Federal lands were already mortgaged, so the federal government had to secure more collateral as surety on the country’s debts.  The only assets remaining were the labor of federal people.  The US government now uses the labor of its numbered people to secure its debts.  To secure the pledge to the creditors, the US has a duty to manage and protect these assets, keep them healthy, and provide for their welfare and enforce their obligations.  More details will be provided  later.

Here is an anti-welfare anti-tax quote from Abraham Lincoln: "You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot help small men by tearing down big men. You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot lift the wage earner by tearing down the wage payer. You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income. You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do themselves."


mobpreviousbutton.jpg (2648 bytes) mobnextbutton.jpg (2403 bytes) mobbeginning.jpg (2403 bytes) mobtablebutton.jpg (3326 bytes)


NOTICE: Steven Dudley Miller, editor, is not affiliated with Freedom School.
NOTICE: If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
       Specialty Areas

All the powers in the universe seem to favor the person who has confidence.
More & Other Information - Resource Pages
Admiralty related items Belligerent Claimant
BondsAttention Signing the Constitution Away
Citizenship / nationality related itemsEducation
Jerry KirkAware
JurisdictionLaw related items
Lewis MohrLuis Ewing
MoneyOath related items
Reading MaterialReading Room
StuffTax matters
Travel related
AntiShyster MagazineVideo
NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank you. Make donation with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure!

Freedom-School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
This enterprise collectively is known and generally presented as "" - "we," "us" or "our" are other expressions of used throughout. "You" is in reference to the user / visitor.

This is the fine print that so important. Freedom School and other information served is so for educational purposes only, no liability expressed or assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to or condone unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and
defend all Law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for [those] men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance. Support is not offered.

Freedom School is a free speech site, non-commercial enterprise and operation as
there is no charge for things presented. site relies on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.

The noteworthy failure of [the] government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and any and all [third] parties affiliated or otherwise. THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC AGREEMENT AND IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT, EQUIVALENT TO A SIGNED, WRITTEN CONTRACT BETWEEN PARTIES - If the government, or anyone else, wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements appearing on this website are not factual or otherwise in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. § 556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification. is not responsible for content of any linked website or material.
In addition, users may not use to engage in, facilitate or further unlawful conduct;
use the service in any way, or manner, that harms us or anyone connected with us or whose work is presented;
damage, disable, overburden, or impair the service (or the network(s) connected to the site)
or interfere with anyone's use and enjoyment of the website.

All claims to be settled on the land - Austin, Travis county Texas, united States of America, using Texas Common Law.
All parts of this contract apply to the maximum extent permitted by law. A court may hold that we cannot enforce a part of this contract as written. If this happens, then you and we will replace that part with terms that most closely match the intent of the part that we cannot enforce. The rest of this contract will not change. This is the entire contract between you and us regarding your use of the service. It supersedes any prior contract or statements regarding your use of the site. If there exists some manner of thing missing we do not forfeit our right to that thing as
we reserve all rights.
We may assign, or modify, alter, change this contract, in whole or in part, at any time with or without notice to you. You may not assign this contract, or any part of it, to any other person. Any attempt by you to do so is void. You may not transfer to anyone else, either temporarily or permanently, any rights to use the site or material contained within.

GOOGLE ANALYTICS: While we do not automatically collect personally identifiable information about you when you visit the site, we do collect non-identifying and aggregate information that we use to improve our Web site design and our online presence.
Visitors to this site who have Javascript enabled are tracked using Google Analytics. The type of information that Google Analytics collects about you includes data like: the type of Web browser you are using; the type of operating system you are using; your screen resolution; the version of Flash you may be using; your network location and IP address (this can include geographic data like the country, city and state you are in); your Internet connection speed; the time of your visit to the site; the pages you visit on the site; the amount of time you spend on each page of the site and referring site information. In addition to the reports we receive using Google Analytics data, the data is shared with Google. For more information on Google's privacy policies, visit:
Here is Google´s description of how Google Analytics works and how you can disable it: "Google Analytics collects information anonymously, and much like examining footprints in sand, it reports website trends without identifying individual visitors. Analytics uses its own cookie to track visitor interactions. The cookie is used to store information, such as what time the current visit occurred, whether the visitor has been to the site before, and what site referred the visitor to the web page. Google Analytics customers can view a variety of reports about how visitors interact with their website so they can improve their website and how people find it. A different cookie is used for each website, and visitors are not tracked across multiple sites. Analytics requires that all websites that use it must update their privacy policy to include a notice that fully discloses the use of Analytics. To disable this type of cookie, some browsers will indicate when a cookie is being sent and allow you to decline cookies on a case-by-case basis."

Presentation Copyright© 2007, 2019
All Rights Reserved