FEDERAL OWNERSHIP OF SLAVES
The Thirteenth Amendment did away with involuntary
servitude. Voluntary servitude
remains entirely Constitutional. Ownership
of slaves remains with us today. By
volunteering to be resident on the feudal manor you become subject to the
lord of the manor, to whom you owe absolute allegiance. Your lord has the right to use whatever force is necessary to
enforce compliance. This is
perfectly Biblical. It is
voluntary servitude because you volunteered.
Even the Supreme Court (92 US@551) said: "The citizen cannot
complain, because he has voluntarily submitted himself to such a form of
Can you be a slave and not know it?
I’ll give you a few hints:
Encyclopedia article Slavery and Serfdom: “Other forms of servitude
related to slavery, and sometimes indistinguishable from it, are serfdom,
debt bondage, indentured service, peonage, and corvee (statute labor).”
Evangelical Dictionary: “Roman laws were passed to protect slaves and
to allow rights, even of private possessions...”
Civil Rights Lawyer Gerry Spence: “People have not
yet discovered they have been disenfranchised.
Even lawyers can’t stand to admit it.”
of American Law
index entry for “Employees”
is “see Master and Servant”
When there were seven years of famine under Pharaoh,
people who wanted to survive sold all their land, their cattle and all their
possessions to Pharaoh in exchange for food.
The next year they had nothing, so they sold themselves into slavery.
In Genesis 47:23-26 SLAVES
OWNED BY PHARAOH HAD A 20% INCOME TAX and were allowed to keep 80%.
IF YOU PAY MORE THAN 20% TAX, THEN YOU ARE WORSE OFF THAN A SLAVE.
Today’s expenditure of federal, state and local governments is 50%
of the gross national product. If
you think you are below the 50% tax bracket, you didn’t add all the hidden
taxes and don’t forget to count your share of the increase in the national
Notice from the Compton’s
Encyclopedia article cited above, debt bondage is sometimes
indistinguishable from slavery. I
have an honest question. At
what point did you agree to pay your share of the National Debt?
The writers of your Constitution, in Article 1, section
8 , delegated to their servants the authority to borrow money; therefore they
were liable for the debts that their servants incurred on their behalf.
They knew that they owed the debt and that their property was the
collateral. At what point did
you become liable for your share? Was
it by being born? Was it by
registering to vote? By
voluntarily paying a tax? Or
was it by agreeing to be a ward on the federal plantation?
Your share of the National Debt is now $97,000 per family.
This is far more than the net worth of all private property.
How do you intend to pay this obligation?
Answer: You agreed that you are the collateral!
The Social Security Act section 801 makes you liable for Social Security Tax and
Before I continue, you need to understand some basics
about what government is, what a republic is and what an all capitalized
PERSON is. Satan has a
counterfeit authority for you to obey.
Your legitimate government went bankrupt in 1933, and was substituted
with a multinational bankruptcy receivership.
Details are covered in depth elsewhere.
Here are the basics:
Government as turned over to creditors
Republic (=free from things Public), private
Proper noun State = original government set up by
Christians as a Church. Instituted
among men to secure those rights, deriving their just powers from the
consent of the governed.
all capitalized STATE
= name of a foreign corporation run by military democracy.
Their state is still their church, it enforces their rituals,
such as oath swearing. There is however, separation of your church from their
state. You consented to
The Constitution was written to control
government. We the People
are masters of the state civil servants.
Federal Servants of your state servants are now
forced to obey their creditors.
Judicial power can not enforce legislated laws:
1- Because servants do not write laws to control their masters
(legislated laws do not apply to the common man) and 2- because there
must be a separation of powers between the legislative and judicial.
There is no Judicial power. Courts obey their chain of command: must enforce legislated
people cease to be private if they register as
Public, or profit from things public.
Government can only do business with registered
PERSONS (as articles in commerce).
This is why they ask for ID identification proof that you are
government property. They
cannot spend appropriated funds, including their labor, dealing with
non-government (private, non-public) people.
Private people cannot receive public credit or
pay interest or receive interest
public PERSONS can receive interest as a public
Can protect society by hanging a murderer without
appeal. Must respect your
right to duel to the death (because servants cannot settle their
Everything must be done in commerce.
Only the all capitalized PERSONS can be charged with a crime.
Wages are taxable only by apportionment. Article
1, section 2 of your Constitution.
National debt is secured by all future wages.
Wage tax pays the interest first.
Only available to unregistered people.
The moment someone accepts a public benefit, their benefactor
protects them from their original church government.
Protection requires subjection. Law dictionary: “protection ... by government is on
condition of his submission to the laws, and such submission ...
entitles the individual to the protection of the government”
Perhaps you now have a hint that you voluntarily
subjected yourself to (are under a legal incapacity to) foreign creditors.
Now, imagine a legal system so diabolical that:
a doctor, by signing a birth certificate, pledges the future
earnings of the baby as collateral for the national debt.
This is also a financing statement pursuant to UCC 9-302.
a couple, by getting a marriage certificate from their owner,
agree that their vows to the state god can be cancelled by their owner’s
divorce court, and agree that their babies belong to their owner.
only the all capitalized names that you see on government IDs
can open a bank account or drive or cash a check or pay a utility bill or
travel by airline or inherit property.
On the other hand, only the all capitalized name can be accused of a
crime, or pay a tax or be drafted.
where people could cancel the obligations of their contracts
where “your” assets are returned to their rightful owner
upon death, by probate
Where the payment of a tax not owed creates an obligation to
make future payments.
Where the US Supreme Court in US v. Kozminski, 487 US 931, has
recently confirmed that it is perfectly lawful to hold slaves to unpaid
forced labor by the use of psychological coercion, threatened physical
force, or threatened legal process. Because
it is voluntary.
Where the Supreme Court determined in Briscoe v. Lahue that police cannot be punished for giving perjured testimony
that convicts someone.
where the head of the Harvard Law School, Alan Dershowitz,
testifies to Congress that there is overwhelming evidence that police and
prosecutors perjure themselves regularly in order to convict the innocent.
where “Federal prosecutors were clearly entitled to immunity
for initiating prosecution, whether or not charges were false, and whether
or not prosecutors knew charges were false...” (Martinez v. Winner, 771
where “Judicial immunity is not waived even though actions
on part of judge were grievously erroneous or prompted by malice or
corruption” (Patterson v. Aiken, 628 F.Supp 1068)
where “Judge is immune from civil damage suits ... immunity
extends even to malicious or corrupt acts.” (Bryant v. O’Connor, 671
where “Absolute immunity shelters prosecutors even when they
act maliciously, wantonly, or negligently.” (Rykers v. Alford, 832 F.2d
where the Supreme Court in 1972 Mitchum v. Foster, 407 US 225,
242 ruled that a citizen injured by a government officer and
seeking injunctive relief needed an act of Congress.
(Aside: I can go on and on, but you get the picture.
Your servants are now out of your control.
We have gone from a nation that must punish corrupt officials, to one
that must not punish corrupt officials.
In fact, up until the early 1900’s there was a judicial doctrine
that “Unclean hands shall never touch the pure fountain of justice.”
As for myself, the troublesome part is where the Hebrew word
“gods” that is in the first commandment “Thou shalt have no other gods
before Me.” refers to judges or magistrates.
I’m beginning to think that legitimate government is the restrainer
in 2nd Thessalonians 2:7 that
has been taken out of the way. This
might just reveal ourselves to be the man of lawlessness. The word “man” in the phrase “man of lawlessness” is
the Greek “anthropos,” from
which we get our word anthropology, meaning mankind.
It is not the Greek word “aner”
which is used for an individual.)
The doctrine of immunity also protects bureaucrats who
deny you your rights for failing to disclose your Social Security Number.
Even though you have a clearly established right to refuse to
disclose a number, bureaucrats cannot be punished unless they are aware of
this right. Doyle v. Wilson,
529 F.Supp 1343. Mr. Doyle could not get his money refunded by a clerk unless
he gave a SSN. The bureaucrats
could keep his money until he gave a number, because they did not know he
had a right to refuse to give a number.
Theft became legal. You
now have to prove to bureaucrats that you have a right to refuse disclosure,
and you have to do this before they punish you!
ATTORNEYS ARE NOT LAWYERS.
An attorney is one who entraps slaves for his master.
An attorney has the duty to turn your allegiance over to his lord.
The word attorney comes from the word “attornment” which means to
twist (no surprise here) or to turn over.
This originally referred to the transfer of feudal land where the
attorney is hired to make sure that all serfs turn over to the new
owner and none were freed. This
is the same today. Again:
Ownership of slaves remains with us today.
Later, I will prove that you have already been turned over to the new
owners of the federal government.
Oxford English Dictionary 1999, ATTORN: “Turn over to
another; transfer, assign... Transfer one’s tenancy or... homage or allegiance
to another; formally acknowledge such transfer.”
Webster’s 1828 Dictionary: ATTORNMENT: “The act of
a feudatory, vassal or tenant, by which he consents, upon the alienation of
an estate, to receive a new lord or superior, and transfers to him his
homage and service.”
I'll start out with examples of legal incapacity.
Being under incapacity, you cannot speak for yourself in any legal
sense and must be represented, in much the same way that parents must ratify
a child's contract (more about this later).
In much the same way that an attorney must represent corporations.
Your government has distinct definitions for different
categories of people. Example:
The US Supreme Court in Logan v. US, 12 S.Ct 617, 626:
was decided that the word `citizen' .... was used in its political sense,
and not as synonymous with `resident', `inhabitant', or `person' ..."
If you are confused by the above quoted terms, then its
time to study their deceptive vocabulary.
Some people have direct allegiance similar to any
enlisted military person.
Others have signed a contract that subjects them to
punishment by their masters.
Still others are responsible for using a government
granted status, which subjects them to an in
Paupers (those supported at public expense), children,
those who have sworn a vow of poverty
At what point does ownership of a slave begin and
waiver of rights end? It is a
very vague distinction. Somewhere
in the gray area, you must mark your line in the sand.
At what point will you divide asunder civic duty from duty to a
master? At what point will you
confess that you are a slave? Let's
take a closer look.
First, a simple definition so that you may understand
your chain of command.
Law: The expressed will of the sovereign.
There is only one Sovereign, and He will judge you on
the judgment day. But, from the
government’s point of view, those who created government, and their
posterity, are their sovereigns. Civil
servants must do two things: obey their masters and control their subjects.
Your government only writes laws for their subjects. They call their subjects by the term “persons”.
Government does not write laws to control their masters.
Your government calls their masters non-persons.
“Persons” are people who are under the government.
“Non-persons” are people who are above the laws of their
servants. They are above the
government they control. LAW
COMES FROM NON-PERSONS. Read
Appendix D now.
The Lord is the Christian’s lawgiver (James 4:12, Isa
33:22). Christian’s founded
this country. Christians
created Christian State governments, not pagan state governments.
The Original State is the Church.
An association of representatives of Christian States in a convention
created your federal government. Congress
could only assemble for the 17 reasons mentioned in Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution. The
Untied States was at one time subordinate to the representatives of your
Christian States’ civil servants.
In Appendix D I have cited many proofs that non-persons
exist and have rights. You are
under the Almighty Sovereign’s chain of command and He expects you to
properly represent this authority.
According to Daniel Garcia’s Law Brief, a
Sovereign person retains all liberties.
He is not part of a nation or state.
Garcia claims that Alexander Hamilton was a sovereign non-Citizen. I have no reason to doubt it.
Alexander Hamilton was never president.
He was the first Secretary of the Treasury and as such he could not
have been a citizen. His duties
are to the Arch-treasurer of the United States (presuming, of course, that
the United States has a right to exist).
The borrower is a slave to the lender (Proverbs 22:7).
A sovereign may be a non-Citizen or a state Citizen.
Let’s examine both:
A non-citizen, such as Alexander Hamilton, keeps all
his natural rights, but has no political rights. He is above man’s government.
A congressman does not represent him.
A non-citizen cannot pay taxes or vote (as in the Supreme Court’s
Elk v. Wilkins case concerning a native American Indian).
I repeat: A NON-CITIZEN HAS MORE RIGHTS THAN A CITIZEN.
A sovereign state citizen gives up some natural
rights in exchange for political privileges.
I’ll discuss citizenship below, and in Appendix D.
Only sovereigns (which include state citizens and non-citizens, but
excludes federal citizens) can have access to the state’s judicial powers,
but this is almost extinct because there are so few left of this dwindling
remnant still qualified to exercise this right.
there is no such thing as a sovereign US citizen.
As you will see, a US citizen is not above government, he is of [of =
belonging to] government. "A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the
federal government..." (Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383 ). For further proof, read your Constitution.
Only state citizens can become President.
No one from Washington DC can become President.
No one from Washington DC can have political rights.
If you understand this logic so far, you now understand
why a non-citizen cannot have a right to work in the US. A non-citizen has more rights than a citizen of any state,
but no one has a right to work within the Federal US government.
The right to work in the US government is a government granted
privilege. Any form that asks
if you work in the US, such as an employer’s I-9 form, is asking if you
are working within the US government. Federal
Congress makes laws for federal persons, they do not make laws for state
Dictionary, first edition (published in 1891 long after the 13th
Amendment) cites the definition of Resident:
tenant, who was obliged to reside on his lord's land, and not depart from
the same, a resident may not be entitled to all the privileges or subject to
all the duties of an inhabitant. 9 Wend. 11."
That’s right! A
resident is a slave on the plantation.
And is not allowed to leave.
A Resident has no Personal liberty.
Black’s Law Dictionary,
first edition gives us the definition of personal liberty:
“Personal liberty consists in the power of locomotion, of
changing situation, of removing one’s person to whatever place one’s
inclination may direct, without imprisonment or restraint unless by due
course of law. 1 Bl. Comm.
As you can see, A RESIDENT IS SOMEONE WHO HAS NO
Caution: only a resident can get a driver's license.
If you apply for a license, you are confessing that you are obliged
to reside on your lord's land, and not depart from the same, and are not
entitled to all the privileges of an inhabitant.
Further Proof: the Supreme Court keeps saying that states cannot
regulate the right to travel by automobile.
Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 US 618 (1969)
and in US v. Wheeler, 254 US 281, 293 (1920)
and in US v. Guest, 383 US 745 (1966) . The right to travel is so basic that it is not even mentioned
in your Constitution. If your
right to travel is regulated, it is probably because you asked for
permission to travel. There are
hundreds of cases that prove this. I
recommend the book The Right to Travel
by Charles Weisman. If you want
a simple 12 page brief on the subject, I recommend you buy a copy of the Aid and Abet newsletter for lawmen, issue No. 11 entitled “U.S.
Courts Confirm Driving a Motor Vehicle is a Right Not Government
Privilege.” (Available from
Aid and Abet, P.O. Box 8787, Phoenix, Arizona 85066).
You are the one that has to decide whether you want to
live in a nation that protects your right to travel, or one that resorts to
brutal force to regulate your travel. If
they can regulate such a basic right, they can easily regulate buying and
selling. If you actually WANT
them to regulate travel, then I remind you “he that leadeth into captivity
shall go into captivity.” If
you are bold enough to believe, as does the Supreme Court, that your Creator
endows you with an inalienable right to travel, then you will constantly be
put in jail by a confederation of beast powers.
If this is enough to wear out the saints, then you cannot dismiss
Caution: only a resident can register to vote.
If you register to vote you are confessing that you are obliged to
reside on your lord's land, and not depart from the same, and are not
entitled to all the privileges of an inhabitant.
If this sounds like you are the secured collateral for a bond issue,
there is a reason for this.
Caution: Before you go claiming that you are an
inhabitant, know that the modern legal definition of inhabitant implies
"a more fixed and permanent abode" than a resident.
This is contrary to the use of this word in both the Articles of
Confederation and in your Constitution.
It is contrary to the use of the term “inhabitants” that is
inscribed on the Liberty Bell. More
about this, later. According to
your Constitution, Presidents must be residents of their state, whereas
Congressmen must NOT be inhabitants of their state.
The definition of resident may also imply that there is
an in rem duty to manage something
belonging to the government. More
about this when we study the Constitutions use of the term “resident”.
Numbers 23:9 Do not count yourself as a resident.
Basic citizenship, non-citizenship, and forced
Citizens are those who enter into a political society.
They voluntarily give up some of their natural liberties in exchange
for political privileges. They
become subject to private law enforcement.
They can be forced into court to settle disputes.
They agree to a lien on their property to pay for any damages they
cause. They agree to accept
service of legal process.
A non-citizen has not entered into a political society.
Like Alexander Hamilton, they must resort to “on-street remedies”
to settle disputes.
Citizenship by birth forces, involuntarily, someone
into a political society. If
this sounds too Catholic to you, there is probably a reason.
If you live in one of the 20 states that still has your
state borders defined by your state constitution [yes, there is a plot to
systematically eliminate all states], then you will notice that your state
constitution gives the judicial power of your state the authority to
naturalize citizens. This is
how naturalization happened for the first 100 years of your once great
nation. Yet you cannot get your
judicial courts to recognize this duty today.
Apparently real state governments do not exist today, they were
replaces by federal corporations masquerading as states.
There are two types of citizenship, state and federal:
Representatives of State Citizens created your federal
government, and they are responsible for controlling their creature.
State Citizens are above your federal government.
They are the masters of your federal government.
Your federal government must obey its masters.
State Citizens are the lords of their public servants. A representative takes an oath of office as worship to his
lords. This is why your federal
government has been systematically eliminating their masters.
[There is interesting evidence that the original lordship still
exists: the Mace of the United States must be present whenever Congress is
in session. The Mace is an
ornamented rack with 13 sticks, by which you could whip your insubordinate
US citizens, give up all natural rights in exchange for
“civil” rights. All
political authority is relinquished to politicians who will regulate
citizens’ travel, marriage, banking, medications, housing, occupations,
guns, education, commerce, etc.
Prior to the Fourteenth Amendment, there was no such
thing as a federal citizen.
In Appendix C, I show that 14th amendment citizenship in your Federal government is not the same as
state citizenship. According to
the Supreme Court, federal citizens cannot have protections from the first
eight amendments. And I repeat:
no one from Washington DC can have political rights or even run for
President. Are you from
Washington DC? You are if you
checked a “US citizen” box on any form, or if you are a resident with a
federal zip code address.
At the end of the Civil War a lawful method had to be
created in order to care for the four million freed slaves who needed a way
to survive. Since your
Constitution has never allowed the government to give entitlements to
people, Federal ownership was just one of the alternatives being considered
for the "freed" slaves. Another
alternative was a treaty whereby freed slaves would live in America as
citizens of Liberia. Five
hundred black families moved to Africa and established the country of
Liberia, with the assurance of making a treaty with the US so that everyone
could live free. Their
constitution is almost identical to yours, except that only blacks can
become citizens. They even
named their Capital after an American president.
In this ultimate battle between good and evil, the treaty never
happened and Federal ownership is what we ended up with, where eventually no
one could live free. Did your
government school teach you this?
In Appendix D, I quote court cases to show that a
person is a non-sovereign. King
George in the Treaty of Paris granted sovereignty to all Americans (while retaining title as
Arch Treasurer). Those who
submit to the laws of congress give up their sovereignty in exchange for a
Sovereigns are those who are above the laws legislated
by their servants. Persons are
those who submit to legislated law. Later,
I will show that the judicial branch of state government protects state
citizens from legislated law.
Throughout history, those who ignore God are taken into
captivity. You were tricked
into becoming a person when you applied for a Social Security number.
In the olden days, enfranchised persons received rights
and protections from a ruler to whom they owe allegiance. This hasn't changed. Enfranchised
citizens are slaves on the federal plantation to whom they owe
Dictionary defines the legal maxim that Protection Draws Subjection:
protection of an individual by government is on condition of his submission
to the laws, and such submission on the other hand entitles the individual
to the protection of the government."
That's right! If
you cannot agree to their perverted, licentious laws then don't take their
protection. You qualify for
benefits by agreeing that they are your protector/master/lord/benefactor.
If you take their benefits, you must submit whether you like it or
not. No matter how evil they
become. No matter how much they
demand. If you take their
benefits, they make your rules. They
determine what is right and what is wrong.
Your moral values are now dictated from your benefactor.
This maxim has always existed. Slaves
submit to their lords. Slaves
must be provided for. Children
must submit to parents. Wives
submit to husbands. The law of
coverture is a part of this legal doctrine.
Christians submit to Christ. What
chain of command are you in?
Further proof of this legal maxim is in the Black's
Law Dictionary definition of Allegiance:
of fidelity and obedience to government in consideration for protection that
government gives. U.S. v. Kuhn, D.C.N.Y., 49 F. Supp. 407, 414"
Conclusion: Applying for benefits subjects you to
"obligation of fidelity and obedience" to a worldly master.
Now that you know what allegiance means, and now that
you know the red beast of Revelation is socialism, and now that you know
that a Russian general will always be in command of the UN military, perhaps
you can now understand that George Bush correctly stated “It is those
sacred principles enshrined in the UN Charter to which we must henceforth
pledge our allegiance.” Biblical
principles remain true. Americans
have sold their birthright. According
to Jesus: Benefactors exercise authority.
Benefactors exercise authority. This is evident in the legal definitions that your government
uses. The legal definition of
‘enfranchisement” makes it seem that God given rights come from
benefactors. Notice how the
following legal definitions focus on benefits without mentioning the
obligations attached to accepting the benefits.
Notice how some of the government granted benefits are counterfeits
of the rights that free people would have.
According to Black's Law
Dictionary today's lawyer definitions of `enfranchisement' include:
"The act of making free (as from slavery)"
"investiture with privileges or capacities of freedom, or
municipal or political liberty"
"Conferring the privilege of voting upon classes of
persons who have not previously possessed such."
"See also Franchise"
Franchise includes the following definitions:
special privilege to do certain things conferred by government on individual
or corporation, and which does not belong to citizens generally of common
it is defined to be a royal privilege in the hands of a subject."
Again: Notice how these are government granted
privileges that allow the person to exercise some of the rights of free
people. But, like any privilege
granted by government, they can be revoked.
I will also show you later that civil rights must be
regulated, and that natural rights cannot be regulated.
Real rights do not come from government.
Government cannot grant rights, although they often refer to their
privileges as rights.
You can read between the lines. These lawyer definitions use freedom and voting as examples
of government granted "rights".
At the risk of seeming too cynical: Livestock has owner granted
rights also. Just because your
current owner can be nice to you, doesn't mean you are free, nor does it
mean you won't be sold. Just
because you can vote for President, doesn't mean you are free.
In fact, it is proof that you are a slave. Even the US Supreme Court says "the Constitution of the
United States has not conferred the right of suffrage upon any one".
(Minor v. Happersett and in US v. Cruikshank).
The courts have ruled that the Buck Act defines
"an individual entity" as franchised persons of government.
Springfield v. Kenny, 104 NE2d 65 and Wheeling
Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 US 193. Social Security and welfare are available only to federal
citizens. Federal citizens
cannot have rights. Social
Security benefits are not available to state citizens.
A state Citizen cannot obtain a Social Security Number without first
obtaining a dual citizenship acknowledged by your federal government.
By getting a number, you change your citizenship. (See Appendix C).
By registering for the benefits available only to enfranchised
persons, you become an enfranchised person. Only those persons receiving
government benefits are required to have a social security number.
No one else has ever been required to get a SSN.
caring, protecting." -
"A person ... placed by a court under the care and supervision
of a guardian or conservator."
Again, protection draws subjection.
You are under the care of the legislature, from whom you get your
`rights' and protections in exchange for your submission.
I can prove that an attorney is your court appointed
guardian, and is considered competent to manage your affairs, whereas you
are considered incompetent to manage your own affairs.
Go to the Law Library and find the legal encyclopedia
entitled "Corpus Juris Secundum".
Look up "Attorney & Client" section 4 in Volume 7 and
read: "His first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the
That's right: he represents the public, therefore he
cannot represent you.
(And don't be deceived by the word `public.'
It means `government'. Examples:
public office, public housing, public roads, public library, public school,
public law, and public records. And
furthermore, as I digress further, the word republic comes from a Latin
idiom `Libera res publica' which means free from government things.
This is from the Collin's Latin
Dictionary. Even Webster's
1828 Dictionary says a Republic has only titular governmental powers.
This is because they can only legislate to those who volunteer into
their jurisdiction. Later, I
will quote the Supreme Court’s Meyer case to show that liberty is freedom
from arbitrary regulations.
Then look up `client':
is one who applies to a lawyer or counselor for advice and direction in a
question of law, or commits his cause to his management... one who
communicates facts to an attorney expecting professional advice.
Clients are also called "wards of the court" in regard to
their relationship with their attorneys."
To find out what it means to be a Ward of the Court, go
to Black's Law Dictionary.
There is only one definition, so you can't possibly get it wrong.
Wards of the court are "Infants
and persons of unsound mind... under the care of a guardian."
That’s right! You
must be crazy to talk to an attorney. You
are not competent to manage your own affairs.
Even asking "... for advice and direction in a question of
law..." or "expecting professional advice" proves that you
cannot manage your own affairs. You
do not have the law in your right hand and forehead.
You volunteered into an evil system that has absolute
contempt for any timid soul who is too faint-hearted to resist his
oppressors. This is the evil
world we live in. Yet in
Christ requires you to tolerate attacks from evil people and
turn the other cheek. These
bullies will have absolute contempt for this behavior.
They don’t understand that you are obeying a higher authority.
Christ was correct that benefactors gain authority over
you (Luke 22:25, but compare to Matt 20:25, Mark 10:42). Rights come only from responsibilities. If you cannot be responsible for providing for yourself, then
don’t expect any rights.
Did you pledge allegiance to your new lord?
Here is what pledge means according to Strong's
Concordance from the four words that are translated into the KJV word
H6162. (in the sense of exchange) a pawn given as security.
H2258. a pawn (as security for debt)
H2254. to wind tightly (as a rope), i.e. to bind; specifically
by a pledge; figuratively to pervert, destroy; also to writhe in pain
H6161. in the sense of a bargain or exchange; something given
as security, i.e. (lit.) a token (of safety) or (metaphor) a
If you want their benefit, you must pay whatever price
they ask. They have asked you
to give yourself as collateral. You
and all your future labor are held as collateral until the national debt is
paid. Later, I will show that
there is a strong link between the US Treasury and foreign authorities,
including the Holy Roman Empire. Also
be aware that there are foreign owners of your Federal Reserve Bank.
The Act to Strengthen Public Credit, signed into law by
Ulysses Grant on March 18, 1869, pledged every American citizen as
collateral for the repayment of all government obligations, including the
national debt. Your federal
government did not own anything, the states and the people owned all the
wealth. In order to get the
central banks to print money, the banks wanted collateral.
You are that collateral. A
classic book on this topic is The Coming Battle by Martin W. Walbert,
published in 1899.
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Miller said:
of taxation is the power to destroy. No
man who is endowed with a modest sum of intelligence would advocate a
transfer of this immense power to a private corporation for its gain.
It would amount to the self-destruction of the nation.
No sane man would advocate the delegation of this high attribute of
sovereignty to a corporation for its individual gain and such transfer of
power would inevitably result in frightful oppression.”
Here are some more details for those who are doing
homework: Hypothecation is a banking term.
Hypothecation is defined in section 14(a) of the Federal Reserve Act
as an offer of assets owned by a party other than the borrower as collateral
for a loan, without transferring title.
The United States is the borrower.
You are the party other than the borrower.
On your behalf, and with your consent, your representatives borrow
most of your national debt from the Federal Reserve Bank.
Section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. § 411) says that
Federal Reserve Notes are obligations of the United States.
This is true even if the Federal Reserve is not a government agency,
because the government has promised to repay the loans to this privately
owned corporation. Federal
Reserve Notes are backed by the full faith and credit of hypothecated assets
(such as your future labor). According
to the Legislative History of Public Law 94-564 "The
U.S. commitment to redeem international dollars for gold became a physical
right! Your bankrupt government
cannot repay Foreign lenders their gold.
They will soon claim their collateral.
You are the collateral.
The following quote should answer any doubt that you
have regarding the legitimacy of the chains attached to receiving benefits.
US Supreme Court in Murdock v. Pennsylvania.
319 US 105 at page 140:
"The ultimate question in determining the constitutionality of a tax
measure is -- has the state given something for which it can ask a
Let's review the legal maxims. Protection draws subjection.
The very definition of allegiance means you are obligated to
obedience if you accept protection. The
state has given something for which it can ask a return.
A pledge of allegiance binds (Strong’s
H2254.) you as collateral. You
grant the power of attorney if you allow them to manage your affairs because
it is presumed that you cannot manage yourself.
Christ said that benefactors exercise authority.
You agree to obey your benefactors, no matter how evil they become.
While you are in their house, you obey their rules.
If you cannot govern yourself, others will govern you.
No matter how much they demand.
Whether you like it or not.
Now you understand that a pledge of allegiance binds
you, and allegiance is an obligation to government in exchange for benefits,
and that government was created (fabricated as an image) and receives
worship and is a benefactor/provider. Perhaps
you’ve worshiped the wrong provider.
State citizens ratified your Constitution to create
your federal government. They
are responsible for managing their creation.
These citizens are sovereigns, and the legislature cannot and does
not write laws for their masters (Matt 10:24, and John 15:20). Never could, still can't.
You won't understand this yet, but State Citizens are not subject to
the laws written by congress (see Appendix D).
According to your Supreme Court in the Mulligan case, state courts
must protect you from federal laws.
If you can be tricked into applying for benefits, you
then become subject to their statutes.
Whether you like it or not. No
matter how evil they become.
The difference in citizenship is distinguished by
whichever law of the land applies to you.
State constitutions are founded on Christian principles. But, according to a Treaty signed by President Adams
"... the government of the United States is not in any sense founded on
the Christian Religion...." More
about this, later.
An employee is someone (as is an indentured servant)
who gives up legal rights to his labor in exchange for care and protection.
The same people who own the IRS own his labor rights.
More about this later.
But you won’t like it.
|Colossians 2:8 (NIV): "See to it that no one takes you captive
through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition
and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ."