GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY NO LONGER COMES FROM "WE THE
Real people don't let others handle their affairs -
they handle their own affairs.
Real people will protect themselves, they don't need
their servants' permission. The
Declaration of Independence stated that governments are instituted among
men to secure unalienable God given rights.
The writers of the Declaration, “... with a firm reliance on the
protection of Divine Providence” pledged their lives, fortunes and honor
to protect themselves and their rights.
They tried to secure the blessings of liberty against the brutal
force of their (British=Roman) government.
At that time it was the most powerful government on earth.
Real people handled their own affairs before they
created your civil government, and they will handle their own affairs now.
They can defend their family, their property, and their community
without permission from a servant. In
a Republic, people are the Lawgivers who created civil government.
God delegated this responsibility to them, and they created a
government to enforce God’s laws. All
government authority comes from them.
Real people must take the law into their own hands.
Created persons cannot take the law into their own hands. Which one are you?
US Supreme Court in Luther v. Borden, 48 US 1:
The governments are but trustees acting under derived authority and have
no power to delegate what is not delegated to them.
But the people, as the original fountain might take away what they
have delegated and intrust to whom they please.
They have the whole title and as absolute proprietors have the
right of using or abusing."
That's right! No
one can delegate an authority that he himself does not have.
All government power comes from the people who created it.
There is no government power that did not come from its creators.
If real people can't do something, then they could not have
delegated that authority to the government they created.
I repeat: If you cannot do something then you cannot delegate, in a
written constitution, an authority you don't have. IF YOU CANNOT DO SOMETHING THEN YOUR GOVERNMENT CANNOT DO IT
EITHER. You delegated the
authority to possess nuclear bombs, prescribe drugs, and execute criminals
because you have these rights, unless you somehow waived your rights. Again: All authority comes from God. If you fail to control your creature, you are irresponsible.
You will suffer the natural consequence of your irresponsibility:
What did you sign that gave away your rights?
Could it be that you agreed to an alternate Lordship?
Will this sin go unpunished?
Throughout the Bible, godly nations prosper, then
turn from God, then are quickly taken into captivity by pagan nations.
Conquering nations are instruments of His discipline (Isa 8:4-10,
10:5-6, 45:1-3, Jer 5:15-18, 20:4-5, 24:10, Eze 21:15-23, 30:24-26,
32:11-15). Is America going
to be any different, or did God change?
Here is a quote from John Philpot Curran, 1790:
"The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal
vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the
consequence of his crime."
US Supreme Court in Fairbanks v. U.S., 181 US 283:
denied are not to be implied; they are to be obtained, if at all, from and
in the same manner provided by, those who originally granted the
enumerated powers, but who at the same time denied powers."
It is your duty (not just a right) to control your
subordinates, wards, children and property.
And this includes anyone who acknowledges their servitude by
worshiping you with an oath (such as an oath of office), or by allowing
you to manage their affairs. You
might just want to regulate their medicine, guns, pollutants, home
repairs, seat belts, marriage, children, dogs, etc.
In the Luther case quoted above, the Supreme Court
said that, as absolute proprietors of your government, you could use or
abuse your servants, and that you might take away what you have delegated
and intrust to whom you please.
Here is a quote from Abraham Linclon:
"Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the
Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate.
The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both
congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to
overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."
Just as the Supreme Court confirmed, all government
authority must be delegated from you.
If you have the authority to posses nuclear bombs, and prescribe
drugs, and execute criminals then you can take care of these essential
tasks yourself, and you can also ask your civil servants to help you, if
you feel that they can be trusted. Since
your Constitution prohibits a standing army, I would suggest not giving
them any bombs. Alexander
Hamilton in Federalist Paper No. 29 said
that the armament in the hands of the citizens was to be up-to-date and
equal to that of the Army, and that there should be “a large body of
citizens, little if at all inferior to [the military] in discipline and
the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of
their fellow citizens.”
Now the topic of Non-Authority.
You cannot expand your authority by delegating powers
you do not have. All
authority is delegated, and your government servants cannot do something
that they are not delegated (i.e., you can fail to delegate, as in the
Luther case, or you can further prohibit powers as was mentioned in the
Fairbanks case). Perhaps you
could even ban their bibles (remember that this servitude "... is not
in any sense founded on the Christian Religion...").
Then how did your civil servant subordinates get the authority to
expand their powers? How can
they do things that they are not delegated?
Things you do not have the authority to do.
Examples: allow sodomy, adultery, pornography for the library,
divorce (can you delegate authority to cancel your neighbors vows to
God?), authorize usury, seize property from those known to be innocent,
prohibit self-medication, deny parents rights, buy Maplethorp art, etc.
And now, even abortion clinics in high schools?
The fruit of the womb is God’s reward, Psalms 127:3.
Shedding innocent blood is a certain way to provoke God's wrath.
God hates the shedding of innocent blood, Proverbs 6:16-17.
Ever since Abel’s murder, shed blood cries out to God, Genesis
4:10. God promised to
abandon, and indeed has always abandoned, any nation that allows shedding
of innocent blood or sexual immorality: Numbers 35:33, Leviticus 18,
Jeremiah 7:6 (although I can’t explain sacrifice of the innocent in 2nd
Sam 21:9). And yes, abortion is mentioned in the Bible.
Acts 7:19 uses the Greek word brephos
meaning a fetus.
Your nation has been surrendered to benefactors.
Your civil ‘servants’ no longer work for you.
Can government ban the Bible from their subjects?
William Tyndale was executed, by civil government, for translating
the Bible into English. It will happen again. At
least Tyndale was a subject. In
the near future, those who refuse to become subjects will be executed.
Revelation 20:4 says that people will be beheaded for refusing the mark.
(by the way, Tyndale was strangled).
In The US Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade
, 93 S.Ct 705
court correctly stated that the 14th amendment does not
protect the unborn. Many
people have used this to conclude, falsely, that your Constitution's
enumerated powers somehow allows you to murder the non-born, without
giving any thought that this logic would also allow murder of the
non-citizen. This case is NOT a citizenship case. It is irrelevant that the 14th amendment has a definition of
federal citizens. The
preamble of your Constitution secures the blessings of liberty to
themselves and their posterity. Their
as-yet-unborn posterity. The
abortion apologists are claiming that the preamble has not secured the
blessings of liberty to the posterity.
The shedding of innocent blood is now a protected right for those
who accept this federal citizenship.
In Appendix C, I discuss this 14th Amendment Citizenship