HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC
CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN
Installment III of IV
The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the People vs. The Banks. - Lord Acton, Lord Chief Justice of England, 1875
Our goal is gradually to absorb the wealth of the world. - Cecil Rhodes, on the secret banking cabal
I am afraid that ordinary citizens will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create and destroy money; and they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of governments, and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people. - R. McKenna, then Chairman of Midland Bank, London
There is no more direct way to capture control of a nation than through its credit (money) system. - Mr. Phillip A. Benson, President of the American Bankers' Association, June 8 1939
This truth is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of Capital to govern the world. By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance. Thus by discreet action we can secure for ourselves what has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished. - Sir Denison Miller
Your Papers Please
It might seem that a pragmatic solution is to get assets out of paper and into substance, yet, we must remember that unless we file the appropriate paper, we won’t even own any substance we think we might. A correctly-filed Financing Statement (UCC / PPSA) will grant immunity to whatever stunt the PTB attempt to pull on us. I have heard it said more than once that the Jews never would have been ‘relocated’ had they had their ‘papers’ in order. I don’t think there is one movie about Nazi Germany where some English speaking actor with a bad accent doesn’t demand, “Yah papahs, pleahs?” I don’t think this is any coincidence. Papers must have meant something. I do not think they are referring to passports. To what they refer are papers indicating whether one is a creditor or a debtor, whether one is the holder-in-due- course of one’s assets or is being held as surety for alleged debt, and whether one has legal title or only equitable title to one’s body, rights, and property. We must get our papers in order. It is not difficult to do. But we have to want to learn and know it and stop believing the propaganda. Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy.
All I have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country. - Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
In 1992, George H.W. Bush told White House reporter Sarah McClendon: If the people were to ever find out what we have done, we would be chased down the streets and lynched.
Federal Income Tax
“These people just don't want to pay their fair share.” A woman once told me, “I owe Revenue Canada a fortune. Thank God there are no more debtor’s prisons.” She didn’t understand that debtor’s prison is ALL there is. Since the only crime is “impeding commerce”, this is the only thing that will imprison anyone these days. You might well wonder, ‘What about murder?’ Remember John. The feds consider everyone a taxpayer and intend to collect a certainamount of $$ through taxes up until that amount hits a peak and yet before they are required to begin to return $$ in the form of Social Security/ Canada Pension (SS/ CP), not to mention Medicare, etc. There actually is a line; take a look at actuaries. If someone kills another before that line is reached, the gov’t regards it as a financial loss and therefore prosecutes the murderer for ‘impeding commerce’ even though it appears to be under the guise of ‘taking the life of another’. Its books won’t balance. The gov’t doesn’t acknowledge living souls; it sees us as surety for a limited liability corporation (LLC) which is a
government-created fictitious entity. But the real living soul, the surety/ accommodation party, will wind up going to jail for creating a debit on its books.
What was the outcome of all the hurricanes in Florida? No more medicare costs for the feds - the majority of those who are either dead or ‘missing’ was the elderly; I told you the feds are desperate.
Weather control has been used for over a decade in the USA; see: http://www.weatherwars.info/ Those hurricanes were most certainly strategically planned. Also, families of those who are allegedly ‘missing’ do not receive any insurance benefits because ‘missing’ is not one of the terms and conditions of the insurance contract - only ‘dead’. Florida hurricanes were designed for the same purpose as the gov’t demolitions of the WTC - to reduce corporate debt.
When Nelson A. Rockefeller was being questioned by Congress prior to his installment to a government appointment, he was asked, “How much money did you make last year?” Rockefeller answered, “$650 million.” “And how much Income Tax did you pay on that?”, they asked. “Nothing”, was the reply. If you pay more taxes than Rockefeller does, don’t you think that you need more education?
Research into who/what is liable to ‘pay’ income tax in Canada reveals in the very first line, to what (notice I didn’t say, ‘to whom’) this applies. Needless to say, the equivalent from the Internal Revenue Code in the USA reveals the same thing. Income Tax Act, Canada, R.S.C. 1985, Chapter 1 (5th Supp.), updated to December 31, 2000 An Act respecting Income Taxes
1. This Act may be cited as the income Tax Act. R.S.C. 1952, c. 148, s. 1.
PART I - INCOME TAX - DIVISION A - LIABILITY FOR TAX
Tax payable by persons resident in Canada
2. (1) An income tax shall be paid, as required by this Act, on the taxable income for each taxation year of every person residing in Canada at any time in the year.
This says it all. You are not a ‘person’. The definition of ‘person’ in Interpretive Laws of Canada and under the 14th Amendment in the USA is: a corporation. Remember that your strawman is a corporate entity created by the government. If you are the surety then you are liable for its taxes, however, if you are the secured party, the creditor to its debtor, then you have first lien against it and the feds have zero control over it and hence no jurisdiction over you. YOU do NOT owe ‘income’ tax; besides, no one has even been able to define ‘income’. Remember the spluttering IRS agent who couldn’t find in the IR Manual where it is written that I am required to pay a tax on my income. Go to H&R Block and pull the same stunt - it makes them crazy. Only if you’re bored that day, though, because you don’t really want to waste much time on their tax fraud stuff - knowing it is a joke might be enough for you. However, if you’re like me and you like to annoy the bureaucrats, trust me that it is very good entertainment. Or ring up CRA, ask them, and listen to them squirm. I now have in my possession ‘Confirmation of Agreement’ evidencing that IRS Commissioner, Mark W. Everson, Commissioner of CRA, Alan Nymark, and Minister of National Revenue Canada, John McCallum, all agree that we are not required to pay income tax, or any of the other taxes I listed above - unless we agree to the terms of their contract. Who would do that?
Most people pay taxes on ‘income’ even though it is not their ‘income’ - it belongs to the Strawman.
How can we have a tax liability on ‘income’ we never received? Even if it were we who received it there is no law requiring anyone to pay any tax, never mind an ‘income’ tax, but Canadians, in particular, justify the confiscation of their earnings by saying that there is a law, which is not true - not even in Canada. They complain about paying taxes yet they defend it. This conflict of emotions is tantamount to the Stockholm Syndrome - the behaviour of kidnap victims who, over time, become sympathetic to their captors (named after a 1973 hostage incident in Stockholm; after six days of captivity in a bank, several kidnap victims actually resisted rescue attempts and later even refused to testify against their captors). Captives begin to identify with their captors initially as a defence mechanism out of fear of violence. Small acts of kindness(read: ‘government benefits’) by the captor are magnified, since finding perspective in a hostage situation is, by definition, impossible. Rescue attempts (by those of us who intend for the sheeple to WAKE UP!) are also regarded as threat, since it is likely the captive would be injured during such attempts. So, it stands to psychological reason that mavericks like me are not trusted, in fact, I am feared - even more than the hostage situation in which most people are unwittingly being held by their governments.
People’s lying to themselves is what saddens me. Those who pay taxes are aggravating the problem;
they believe they have no choice - they have been held hostage. Whether they pay the tax or not is not important in the grand scheme. What IS important is what is going on in their minds, which happens to be fear. There is no freedom, no aliveness, where there is fear. People actually lie awake at night in fear of how they are going to pay their ‘taxes’. It cracks me up, but my heart goes out to them. Their angst is completely unwarranted.
Your ‘income tax’ does NOT go to operate the Federal Government. You make out the check to theIRS/CRA (both private corporations). Who endorses it? Look at the back of the cheque. See who got the $$$? (a private corporation) the FRB, Inc./Bank of Canada, Inc. Then the cheque goes to The Governor- Secretary of the Treasury of the IMF, Inc. of the United Nations. Those who pay taxes on ‘income’ are giving away hard-earned ‘money’ to the United Nations, a world wide Communist organization, the intent of which is Collectivism. Five months of your income went to support Collectivism (I’d say, ‘Communism’ but this causes people’s minds to close, and the “I don’t believe in conspiracy theories” kicks in, so I say Collectivism. Tax funds do NOT run the gov’t or any of its alleged programs; the IMF runs the gov’t; your $$$ is inconsequential to gov’t operation. Taxing is simply the means to confiscate your personal power. No sovereign can be taxed; only corporate entities can be taxed and only by the agreement of the principle/ surety - you - if indeed you agreed to it. Why might you voluntarily, willingly, and knowingly do that? You wouldn’t. You’ve been tricked into it. Many people highly resent paying taxes. Since they feel thwarted in being able to do anything about it, they figure out ways to get something back for paying into a system which doesn’t work for them. They exact their dues by frequenting hospitals, doctors, filing insurance claims, workman’s comp, etc. and feel no compunction about doing this because they truly believe they’ve ‘paid’ for it. All this does is keep them locked into the belief that they’re ‘getting’ something. The problem is, because ‘intention is everything’, their behaviour is fueled by resentment. This won’t work for them in the long run. Worse, they become dependent upon gov’t benefits. We can not afford to be dependent upon any entity which doesn’t have our best interests at heart. Better, by far, would be to release the fear we have surrounding our beliefs about who we are not.
VAT (Value Added Tax = Sales Tax, etc.)
This is just another means to confiscate your funds and your personal power. GST (goods and services tax) is another ‘use’ tax which we are not required to pay, not only because there is no law compelling us but also because of who we are, which we have been persuaded to forget. I like to carry around a “Tax Exemption Certificate” which I show the owner/manager of places I frequent to prove I am not obligated to pay any tax, never mind I am not obligated to pay for anything. Not only did I already pre-pay whateverit is I want but also I am not subject to any ad valorem tax (VAT). Again, sovereigns are not required to pay tax. We are sovereign until we acquiesce to behaviour which vitiates this fact. Is the queen tax exempt?
Is the Pope Zionist?
So, we are tax exempt and all we have to do is say so, even though we have been taught no longer to believe in our sovereignty. My prime concern is gas because the total tax is 37%. I know I’m not required to pay it; I even have the corroboration of CRA, however, I am having trouble with the oil corporations. After perusing my gas receipts I sent the CFO (chief financial officer) a true bill for $146.00. He has yet to fork over so I paid for gas one day with a Transfer Instrument. He called the cops on me because his fiduciary (yes, a bankster) didn’t recognize it. I straightened it out with the RCMP and told the CFO that I wanted the name of the officer at his bank because the Receiver General probably wants to know who is not honouring my transfer instruments, particularly since he and I have an agreement that they will be honoured. I probably won’t bother to file a PPSA against this twit for a measly $146 in GST and fuel taxes, the financial liability of which he has unlawfully passed along to you and me.
Should I abide by the rules until they’re changed, or help speed the change by breaking them? - Ashleigh Brilliant
A cop once stopped me for seatbelt violation. I asked him, “Who is the injured party?” “The State of New Mexico.” The State of New Mexico doesn’t exist; New Mexico state exists. When I asked him, “If
I were to call The State of New Mexico to the stand, who would show up?” He didn’t know how to answer me because no one would or could show up. No name in upper case can be an injured party because it is a fiction, an entity created by the government. Only flesh and blood living souls can be ‘injured’. So, he asked me for a driver licence which I didn’t have because having one would grant him immediate jurisdiction over me which, as yet, he didn’t have. I asked if I were required to have one and if so, could he provide for me the law which compels me. Later, he did actually show me the statute, “all operators must be licensed”, but I noticed that it did not apply to me, nor did it detail any consequences for said ‘operator’, which also was not I, if this person were not licensed. There was no implementing regulation - the enforcement clause. It was simply one of many traffic codes which apply only to those who thought them up. They have no clout with those of us who don’t agree to them.
Laws can’t compel; they can only protect. If the law doesn’t protect me, the law doesn’t apply to me.
Hence, there is only one law - the golden rule and the breaking of this law results in the infringement upon the life, liberty, property, or rights of a natural being who has every right to seek just compensation for the injury. Everything else is statute and applies only to those who are subject to them - namely those who thought them up. All codes, rules, regulations, statutes, and ordinances apply only to those involved within the departments who documented them. What?! So, the Internal Revenue Code applies only to IR Agents, CCRA codes apply only to government employees - and anyone else who might care to contract with those agencies. Do you? I don’t.
The function of the law is not to provide justice or to preserve freedom. The function of the law is to keep those who hold power, in power. - Gerry Spence - From Freedom to Slavery, 1993
When only lawyers can understand the law, then only lawyers should be required to obey the law. - Chuck Conces
Under current law, it is a crime for a private citizen to lie to a government official, but not for the government official to lie to the people. - Donald M. Fraser
Since ‘Equality under Law is Paramount and Mandatory by Law’, and we know everyone in court lies -its a dog and pony show - why was Martha Stewart sentenced to prison for .... ‘lying’ ? It is because she agreed not to. Since contract is the only law, she breached the contract wherein she agreed ‘to tell the truth....’. Had she declined ‘to tell the truth’, she would not be in prison. There is no law against ‘lying’. When you break the big laws, you do not get liberty; you do not even get anarchy. You get the small laws (codes, rules, regulations, statutes, ordinances). -G. K. Chesterton
The minute you read something you can’t understand, you can almost be sure it was drawn up by alawyer. - Will Rogers
Minding one’s business is the only moral law. - Frederic Bastiat, The Law
I have been asked rather sarcastically, “So, you think you are above the law...” Of course, I am above the law. Bob Dylan said, “to live outside the law you must be honest”. It makes me more honourable. The creator is always above the created. If man made laws, then man is above what he made. I never said I was above the Creator’s laws, I claim to be above man’s laws, mostly because they don’t apply to me. But that’s not my point here. Think of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. This is an example of the created being above the creator. Did it work for Dr. Frankenstein to create something more powerful than himself? Why then, would we think it would work for us?
Stopping at a Stop sign when we can see well in advance of the intersection that there is no reason to stop is just being subject to idiocy. Is it our intention, in this example, to serve a Stop sign or was it our intention to create the sign in order to serve us? Why are we bowing to it ? Are you saying, “But I stop so the the police won’t charge me with not stopping at the Stop sign.” The role of police is changed.
When I was a child, I was taught, “The policeman is your friend. If you become lost, find a policeman (who would, in those days, be walking his beat, deterring shop theft by his mere presence, so it would be easy to find one on almost any street corner) and he’ll bring you home.” Mums would be so grateful that he would be invited in for tea and biscuits. I have been obliged to teach my children, “The policeman is not your friend. If you become lost and go to a policeman, he might bring you home but he will take me to jail for child neglect and for allowing my child to get lost.” Remember, the presumption is that my children don’t belong to me but to the state and I would be charged with neglect of their property. It just so happens that my boys do belong to me because I have actively rebutted that presumption.
Actually, my sentiments towards police have been learned as, I started out liking them. When I was 20 I was hitch-hiking up north in Ontario to visit my boyfriend. A cop stopped me and I thought I was in deep trouble. As it turned out, he truly did care for my welfare and stopped a car with a bunch of kids and told the driver to take me to Fern Resort in Orillia. The cop gave me the proverbial police escort to the exit ramp, and the kids thought it was a hoot and took me directly to my destination.
I am reminded of the story of a fellow in Michigan who has five children, the first four of whom have birth certificates. The youngest was born at home and hence has no birth certificate (same as mine). One day the dad was in a store with his kids and was yelling at one of them. A ‘public-minded’ woman overheard this and, like all good informants, telephoned Child Protective Services to report child abuse. The next day the cops came by and confiscated all five of his children. The following day the cops came by and returned the youngest, saying, “This one’s not ours.” This is reason enough to make sure your children belong to you and not the state. For you Canadians who think that your public servants are above this type of seeming theft, think again. It is not theft. If you have signed over your children to the public via the birth registration I suggest you get your papers in order to prevent the feds from collecting their collateral - those whom you call ‘my children’ - for the interest on the loan. So, what is the job of policemen these days? It is not “to serve and protect”, unless this refers to serving and protecting the World Banksters. Their sole purpose is to collect revenue for the interest on the debt due to the bankruptcy. They are no longer “Peace Officers”. The Motor Vehicle Dept./ Dept. of Transportation (MVD/DOT) are under the Tax and Revenue Dept. What does this tell you? This is why there are so many idiotic statutes which are a result of Admiralty Law which simply do not apply to living souls; they apply to corporate entities. So how is it we get stuck with the fine if the statutes don’t apply to us?
Since laws cannot compel performance, there can be no law telling a property owner that he must build his house on a particular area of his property. Because, what if he doesn’t? Upon whose rights is he infringing? Well, possibly his neighbour, in which case the neighbour would be obliged to file a signed, sworn complaint, ideally also signed by a deposable witness, and have a jury decide if he is indeed an injured party. Laws cannot do anything but protect the life, liberty, property, and rights of a living soul.
Laws are to serve us; we are not here to serve laws. “if your laws don’t protect me, your laws do not apply to me.” So, yes, we are above the ‘law’(when the word ‘law’ refers to ‘statutes’).
The problem is now statutes. Statutes are compelling. They seem to tell us everything we are obliged to do and everything we can’t do. Statutes have replaced the true ONE LAW. Where before, we could be found guilty for actively breaking the only law there was, we can now be found guilty for doing ‘nothing’, meaning neglecting to perform precisely as the statute dictates. Since there are so many, this will occur automatically just in the affairs of daily life. That cliché, ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse’ was true when ‘the law’ to which it referred was the only law we were required to know. But since that one law no longer exists, except in our hearts, that cliché now applies only to statutes. ‘Ignorance of the statutes is no excuse.’ Ignorance of the statutes is EVERY excuse because there are 60,000,000 of them, 59,999,973 of which no one has informed you. Trust me, you are guilty of ‘disobeying’ some, if not many.
What happened? Attorneys make up statutes. So a few questions come to mind.
1) To whom do these statutes apply?
2) Who benefits when one does not adhere to statutes?
3) What is the purpose of having so many statutes, codes, rules, regulations, ordinances, legislation in the first place?
4) Since when can attorneys make laws? -rather, statutes?
5) isn’t law-making the job of gov’t?
6) Why would any representative of the people enact statutes which don’t serve his constituents?
The “Trading with the Enemy Act” of 1917 reclassified us all as ‘belligerents’ under an emergency situation (actually a declaration of war). So your rights were suspended and a strawman created with an SSN/SIN. Since the politicians did away with the common law and other law which constituted the traditionally vested right of the people, what was put in its place? Commercial Law. This is why people lose trying to argue ‘Constitutional rights’. Courts are military tribunals sitting in summary court martial proceedings against civilians. Constitutional and common law arguments are not allowed in such courts. If we were to go back to the common law, as brutal as it might have been, the entire system of welfare, income taxes, bureaucracy, codes, ordinances, regulations, bylaws, legislation, and rules would cease to exist.
The Legal Profession has no more to do with ‘law’ than the Medical Profession has to do with ‘health’. So, when you hear nonsense such as, “practising law / medicine without a licence”, notice that the accused is usually practising ‘health’ or its counterpart in ‘law’ where a licence isn’t required. A licence is acquired only by those who choose to be under the jurisdiction of the entity issuing said licence. Those of us who choose to remain free make certain not to obtain any licences at all. A ‘licence to practise law” is procured by an attorney from the client who hires him and, until such time, does not have ‘a licence to
practise law’. Yes, he has a bar card but this has nothing to do with a licence to take a case which must be obtained from the one who hires him. Consequently this is a great question to ask an attorney whom you don’t want involved in your commercial affairs. I like to tell them that I don’t give them permission to make a legal determination about me, because, until I do, they have no venue or jurisdiction. They are a stray looking for a home. They have nowhere near the power they like you to think they have.
So, you want to be an ‘attorney’; here is your ‘job description’:
-prosecute on behalf of IRS/CRA in order to imprison one for ‘failure to file’;
-be appointed to (foisted upon) us by a ‘judge’ upon our being accused of a crime;
-reject our filing of private documents into the public record
-initiate and file all criminal complaints (we are prohibited)
-confiscate property & funds from marital partners; dictate child custody during divorce proceedings
-regulate private property via land use, planning laws, and codes
-advise employers to confiscate funds via withholding tax from paycheques
-approve the confiscation, by Child Protection Agents, of children from their families
-begin foreclosure proceedings when too many mortgage payments are missed;
-confiscate property when property taxes aren’t paid;
-pilfer our estate via probate after our death;
-turn into a ‘crime’ an activity which has been natural and lawful for centuries, yet, due to current legislation, now requires a licence;
-initiate actions against us for committing a crime which, until recently, was a lawful activity;
-reap hefty fees for exaggerating personal injury claims causing insurance premiums to sky-rocket;
-claim to be able to handle personal disputes better than those involved;
-complicate simple contracts between 2 parties to where they are completely incomprehensible;
-file unnecessary, embellished paperwork for what would normally be considered simple claims;
-depersonalize and complicate intimate processes such as adoption;
-be the only one allowed into a jail cell even though a friend might better assist us;
-play both sides of the ‘court’;
-through the BAR police your own, be in charge of accreditation of Law Schools, determine the curriculum in Law Schools by granting or refusing accreditation, make and enforce laws designed to work only for you, make and enforce statutes which are impossible not to violate because there are over 60 million of them.
-be the power behind all agencies which control the rest of us;
-be a henchman and revenue collector for the IMF/ International Banksters;
-become ‘power of attorney’ when we hire you (grant you a ‘licence to practise law’), thereby rendering ourselves ‘incompetent’;
Once I told an attorney, with as straight a face as I could muster, that I truly believed that he was an honest fellow. He responded with, “Well, I try to be.” I said, “Well, if you were truly honest, you wouldn’t need to try to be.” (He was as crooked as a dog’s hind leg).
My all-time favourite attorney-routine is the asking of two questions for the price of one. “Did you or did you not ... ?” An attorney once asked me one of these double-edged questions and so I asked, “What is it you want to know?” He repeated the question so I answered, “Which question do you want answered?” He repeated it again, so I said, “no to the first question; yes to the second.” Not only didn’t he understand my answer, but also he didn’t understand his own question. If I had answered just “yes”, how could he know to which part I was referring? “Yes, I did not ...”? or “Yes, I did ... ”? As idiotic as it is, attorneys still use this inane manner of questioning. They must think it sounds daunting, when in fact it only makes them sound as if they don’t know what they’re talking about, which in most cases is true.
But this stunt also allows them to twist any answer to suit their case. Don’t fall for it. Always answer with either “I did” or “I did not” ....... in fact, skip the court altogether - there is nothing requiring you to go in the first place. Whom did the court ‘invite’? You? I don’t think so. All you have to do is RSVP. An invitation to court is tantamount to an invitation to a Charles Manson party. Don’t go. Later, I’ll tell you how to decline graciously.
A licence is “a permit to do some activity which would otherwise be illegal”. A licence is the authority
to act on something which in its nature is lawful but prohibited by statutes except with permission of authority. This activity is now a privilege and can be revoked, leading to no liberty - ‘liberty’ being defined as: ‘freedom and exemption from extraneous control’. Take a look at all the activities for which most people have been conned to believe we are required to have licences: marriage, building, driver, firearms, business, professional, trade, BAR ticket, hunting, etc. which tells us that without these permits, the following activities are illegal: creating a home and family with someone you love, adding a room onto your house, traveling to a friend’s house in your personally-owned automobile, protecting your family from intruders, ‘earning your living’ from your privately-owned business, taking care of infirmed fellow living souls, fixing someone’s plumbing/electricity, going into a court of law (apart from the fact that they are no longer in existence - they are now courts of commerce) about a matter between you and a colleague, shoot your food in the wilderness, etc. etc. The list goes on. Why would a free man or woman require permission from the government to get married, drive a car, start a business, add onto one’s home, or improve one’s property?
We are no longer free to do anything because statutes have been enacted requiring us to get permits in order to do some activity which does not infringe upon the life, liberty, property, or rights of another. Its all about control. The Catch 22 of this is that you’re damned if you don’t have a licence because you will get fined for not having one, and damned if you do because you will get fined for doing something which the permit does not allow. Either way one is asking for control.
Personally, I take a chance on not having the licence. I have NO licences. I have given up all of them. I do have a ‘driver permit’ which I created for the purpose of facility - something to show the cops to pacify them as opposed to telling them “I don’t have a driver’s licence”, which I have done on occasion and has only created problems as opposed to accomplishing what I intended. Yet, what I carry is not government issued, it is self-issued. Those of us with self-issued ‘licences’ not only claim our rights in a responsible and organized way as a peaceful transitional declaratory offering for gov’t observance but also it introduces the concept of liberty to others.
The problem is the contract. If we don’t have a contract with the ‘authority’, they have no authority over us. Alleged ‘authorities’ do everything in their power to intimidate us into getting these permits, such as telling us it is law, etc. when in fact they cannot make anyone get a licence for anything since this would be forced contracting, the very nature of which would make it invalid. Not only do we have unlimited right to contract but also unlimited right not to contract.
So, since I graduated from a school which gave me a diploma stating that I obviously knew enough about nursing in order to get a job doing this, why do I need a licence to do it? Have you ever noticed that in obtaining a driver licence, the two things they most want from you is a signature and an address? They couldn’t give a damn if you know what to do with the car, they want to get your signature on this fraudulent contract and also know where they can find you if you do something they don’t like and they can come and get you and/or your car.
Never put on any contract the location of where you sleep at night and never carry any ‘ID’ with an ‘address’ on it. I carry a very out-dated (15 years) passport because its picture of me is great. Actually, it is great ID because it has no ‘address’. One time a cop asked me for ID. I asked him if I were required to have ID. Sensing I could be causing trouble, I pulled out some “ID” and said, “Well, I do have ID but the info on it is only hearsay; I don’t know if its true, so how would you know? Is hearsay admissible in court?” That was the end of that.
Never sign any contract unless you are given full disclosure and understand every term of the contract.
Never agree to any terms and conditions which you know won’t work for you. This is the purpose and meaning of a contract - something to which both parties can agree to be bound without compunction. So, feel free to line-out and be sure to initial what you don’t like. Then, in the place for ‘signature’, write, “By: (your autograph), agent”, as you are agent to the strawman, no doubt to which the contract applies. Once ‘signed’ it cannot be changed. As ‘acceptor’ or ‘rejector’, you are in control. Make it work for you.
Never sign without including something like, “without prejudice” or “All Rights Reserved”, or UCC1-207, which will protect your right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that you did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. Or, add ‘agent’ or ‘authorized representative’ after your signature, which means that you, the living soul, are not the entity to whom the alleged contract applies. The word ‘By:’ right before your autograph is the best because it evidences your agency.
Licences control, regulate, stifle, intimidate, rob, and destroy. Licensure is presented under the guise of protectionism. Governments license in order to make work for secretaries, boards, bureaucrats, and commissions whose function it is to assure government an additional source of revenue from the price of
granting its permission. Tyrannical governments prefer that their subjects/ slaves be required to ask for their permission prior to, and as a condition of, doing nearly every kind of independent, public, or private activity. Such governments want servile subjects who do what they are told to do. So, entire administrations are created to promote the acceptance of licensing as ‘for the common good’ or ‘for public protection’.
Protect me from the Protectors. -Don Croft
Governments need armies to protect them from their enslaved and oppressed subjects. -Tolstoy
Gov’t licensing is all about the difference between a ‘right’ and a ‘privilege’. A ‘free’ individual has the right to do anything as long as in doing so no threat or harm is done to the life, liberty, property. or rights of another. However, one must request permission to do something which transgresses the rights or property of another, in which case only the one owning the right or property has the authority to grant the permission. As the government has no rights to give - it has only duties and limitations - and it has no authority to collect any revenues other than duties, impost, and excise taxes. Gov’t has no authority to profit financially from licensing.
The only way that ‘everyone’ could ‘know’ anything is if someone had a vested interest in making sure that ‘everyone’ ‘knows’ something. In every case of ‘everyone knows’ is one who stands to benefit by what ‘everyone knows’; hence it can not possibly be a truth since all ‘truths’ seem to be known by very few because all truth can be known only intuitively and/or experientially. I don’t know of anything that‘everyone knows’ which is true, do you? The only reason that ‘everyone knows’ anything is because they’ve been propagandized into allegedly ‘knowing’ - the public fool system being the best perpetrator of this fraud. How is it that an entire continent can know when to set clocks ahead and back, yet very few know that when we are upset it is never for the reason we think. Did someone forget to put that on the front page of the newspaper? So, if everyone knows something - anything, you can count on there being one with something to gain from our ‘knowing’ it. You can also count on its being untrue. Therefore, ‘everyone knows you have to pay income tax, get a driver’s licence, get a good education’, etc. - none of which is true. “Everyone Knows” You Have to Go to Court When You are Summonsed.
Never go to court. The court is only a third party debt collector for a foreign corporation. You are never named on any summons. Even that which you consider to be your name is not you; it only represents you.
You are not a party to the action. You cannot be charged because no fiction (any public entity) can bring any claim against a living soul. So, when you are served a summons, check to see if your name is on it. It can’t be. The exception is, of course, if the Plaintiff is another living soul and is bringing you into court because you truly have injured him by breaking the one law, which he will have to prove.
When you go into court, you are putting your fate into the hands of 12 people who weren’t smart enough to get out of jury duty. -Norm Crosby
Since the courts get more mileage/kilometrage from our thinking that the Constitution/Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the law which the courts are bound to use and wasting our time citing it, they really don't want us to know that it doesn’t apply. Actually, this is good news, better news, and best news since relying upon these documents for legal argument just makes judges rule against us. These document sapply to sovereign entities, however, if you find yourself in court it is because you have relinquished your sovereignty or you wouldn’t be there. So, in fact, if you are in court these documents do not apply to you.
The supreme law of the land is contract law and falls under the UCC. The significance of Erie vs. Thompkins case decision of 1938 is that no cases prior to 1938 are allowed to be cited. There can be no mixing of the old law with the new law. All lawyers are members of the BAR and controlled by the Lawyer's Guild of Great Britain. They created, formed, and implemented the new bankruptcy law and are sworn to uphold the bankruptcy. We can never know the true ‘nature and cause of the accusation’ because it is ..... the collection of interest on the bankruptcy.
We are denied our right to challenge the creditor/banker because if we could ‘face our accuser’ we could ask about our indebtedness and this would blow their cover. They would have to provide us with the contract proving we knowingly, voluntarily, and willingly agreed to pay the corporate public debt which, ofcourse, we did not do. The PTB have apprised the government/attorneys of the laws/statutes under which this system works. We have moved from real law to statutes made up by the attorneys for the sole purpose of collecting revenue and property.
You assist an evil system most effectively by obeying its orders and decrees. An evil system never deserves such allegiance. Allegiance to it means partaking of the evil. A good person will resist an evil system with his or her whole soul. - Mahatma Gandhi
Read the ‘law’ and you will see that it suggests a circumstance which works for one and all. Read any statute and you will see that it compels one to a particular performance, which implies yet never states, if not performed, a fine is imposed. There is no mention of fines in any statute, code, rule, or regulation. Where is the implementing regulation? They all just state what we are all supposed to do. The reason most have not squawked too much about these statutes is that they believe they are getting some privilege which compensates for the occasional fine, and yet just the opposite is true.
A neighbour told me years ago that she was all for everyone getting Social Security Numbers. “If they can catch just one ‘dead-beat dad’, then it is worth it.” This is what she was led to believe. If you ask the wives of these ‘dead-beat dads’, you’ll discover that the pittance the feds give her, after ordering dad’s boss to garnish his wages, is taxable and she will be worse off than before, particularly if she has paid an attorney to bring dad into court in order to get the order. It is never worth it. Again, it is win/win for the feds and lose/lose for both parents. If only parents could to sit down and negotiate, they, along with their children, would all win. Involving the state means you lose all control.
Just so you know that there is a light at the end of the tunnel - and it is not an on coming train - here is an encouraging story. In her book, Energy Medicine, Donna Eden tells of having taught a class wherein one of the attendees was a judge. Imagine a judge being so enlightened as to go to a class on ‘energy medicine’. A few months later he contacted her and related a case he had before him. A man had beaten his wife and the neighbour who had attempted to intervene. The children were aghast and everyone was stunned because this man was a true family man and good neighbour; he just went berserk one evening.
The judge asked Donna Eden, “Just before I pass sentence on this fellow I wonder if this might be a case of that ‘triple-warmer’ thing we learned about in your class” - a meridian line of energy which when blocked causes chaos. Donna thought so from the description of the man’s behaviour. The judge sentenced the man to a dozen of Donna Eden’s Energy Medicine classes. So, you see, we are making our way into the light. Is this a judge we want our fellows and/or ourselves to face? You bet!
1. A self appointed tribunal or mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded, perverted or parodied.
2. A court or tribunal characterized by authorized or irregular procedures, esp. so as to render a fairproceeding impossible.
3. A sham legal proceeding. Black’s 7th page 359 Common Law Courts (CLC) vs. Judge’s Chambers (JC) (commonly known as municipal, district, state, provincial, appellate, supreme, federal, courts)
1. one law - the Golden Rule - you are free to do anything you please as long as you do not infringe upon the life, liberty, property, or rights of a living soul.
2. is the truth JC
1. Equity Law - compels performance via contract. This can be only civil, not criminal, yet failure to perform as directed by a court can bring charges of contempt which is a criminal action.
Admiralty/ Maritime Law - civil jurisdiction of compelled performance which has criminal penalties for breach of contract. Since International contract backs codes, etc. and ‘courts’ won’t admit to this jurisdiction, they call it Statutory Jurisdiction. There are 60 million statutes, codes, rules, regulations, ordinances. Since 1938, all decisions will be based upon commercial law with criminal penalties. (This is why you can go to jail for not wearing a seatbelt.) 2. is colourable - truth can not be seen or heard *
Purpose CLC - to compensate injured party
JC - to obtain a contract in order to collect revenue for the Crown, to pay the interest on the Bankruptcy.
Recognizes CLC - Plaintiff and Defendant
JC - only ‘debtors’ and ‘creditors’; ‘fictions’ and ‘sovereigns’
CLC - belongs to jury
JC - Judge has none and so tricks us into granting it Judge’s role
CLC - Judge is mediator
JC - Judge approves motions and signs summary judgements - against living souls
CLC - defendant is summonsed to court via a signed, sworn, witnessed complaint by an injured party
JC - living soul is tricked into chambers as ‘defendant’ via a summons, thereby granting jurisdiction. The summons needs only to be signed by the ‘judge’ thereby making it a summary judgement.
CLC - defendant can plead “innocent”
JC - no ‘innocent’ plea, only ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ or ‘no contest’ Procedure
CLC - straight-forward and works for all involved
JC - is backwards or mirror-image; works only for the ‘court’
CLC - accuser whom defendant can face
JC - corporation represented by a prosecuting attorney who confronts defendant
Burden of proofCLC - accuser must prove defendant’s guilt
JC - defendant must prove innocence - yet, it is impossible to prove a negative
CLC - presents himself or has a lawyer represent him ; (‘defend’: ward off attack from; OED; the word itself accurately suggests we are going to court as one to be attacked)
JC - Strawman, represented by an attorney
Arguing and testifying CLC - will present the truth of the matter
JC - will put us into ‘dishonour’, make us the ‘debtor’, - no debtor can win; no creditor can lose
CLC -defendant is either “guilty” or “innocent”
JC -attorneys have the defendant plea bargain since, if defendant is indeed innocent the attorney makes nothing on the deal, other than his client fees; hence, the attorney works both sides of the court.
CLC - infringement upon life, liberty, property, or rights of a living soul (a civil suit)
JC -all crime is commercial - a breach of contract
Attorney CLC - none is needed; the defendant ‘presents’ himself or hires a lawyer to work for him
1. tricks living soul to believe he is the ‘Defendant’,
2. is sworn to collect revenue for the Crown,
3. represents both sides of the court - the corporate strawman defendant and the Crown so he can’t lose
4. makes sure his client loses so he can get a cut of the fine (not so in civil suits)
5. works solely for the court unless he contracts to work for the living soul in which case he becomes a 'lawyer' Jury CLC - ‘trial by jury’; the jury judges both the facts of the case AND the law itself JC - ‘jury trial’ which means that the jury does what the ‘judge’ directs - this might include ignoring either the facts of the case and/or the law in question
CLC - defendant is permitted to face his accuser (the injured party)
JC - defendant is charged by prosecutor who represents the Plaintiff - always a corporation, never a living soul
“Do you understand?”
CLC - judge asks this in order to know if defendant is clear
JC - judge asks this in order to get defendant to contract
CLC - jury gives verdict; judge sentences with jury’s approval, a living soul pays a fine or serves time
JC - Strawman/Defendant, not living soul, is sentenced. Unfortunately, the living soul thinks he is the Defendant. Everyone who is in jail is there because of something he said, or failed to say, prior to, or during, an administrative tribunal, not for some ‘wrong’ deed.
* In an equity court, which is all there is since there are no more courts ‘of law’, when we are asked, “Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you God?”, we must respond “No” - not to be contemptuous but rather because the ‘truth’ can not be told. Courts of equity can neither see nor hear ‘truth’. They are courts of fiction and cannot have any truth within. If indeed one tells the ‘whole truth’, the cat will be let out of the bag and he will thereby be in contempt and go directly to jail. We must tell ‘our’ truth, which is that we accepted and returned their offer, (more later), yet telling ‘the’ truth will land us in jail very quickly. Remember that Martha Stewart got herself into trouble not by having anything to do with ‘insider trading’ but by lying. Since there is no law against ‘lying’, the only way she could be convicted was for her to have made it a crime to lie. The only way that she could have made ‘lying’ a crime is by contracting and agreeing not to lie. The only way she could contract and agree to that was to ‘swear to tell the truth’ - it was her swearing in that created the contract which she later breached by lying - which convicted her. Had she never agreed /contracted to ‘tell the truth’, she never would have been convicted. Her conviction had nothing to do with ‘insider trading’ OR ‘lying’; it had everything to do with contracting.
I am not making this up; the courts literally trick us into contracting with them in order for us to slit our own throats by breaching the terms and conditions of the contract. This is WHY we are asked if we will ‘swear’. We have an option; we are not required to tell the truth unless we swear we will - i.e.: enter into a contract with someone and agree to tell the truth. The sole purpose of that question is to get us to contract.
They have NO jurisdiction until we contract. As long as we do not contract with them - and no law can compel anyone to contract - we can remain free. We have the right to contract and .... the right not to contract. All they do is go along with us. They have no commercial energy of their own - they rely on us to give it to them. “All law is commerce; all commerce is contract; no contract - no case”.
The following “Toothpick Story” illustrates this concept. A fellow went to court and had managed not to contract right to the end when he said, “It seems my public business is finished here so I am now
leaving”, and headed to the door. The judge yelled, “And take that toothpick out of your mouth!” and the man did. As soon as he did, the judge yelled to the Bailiff, “Arrest that man.” Why? Because by removing the toothpick from his mouth the man had contracted with the court.
All Law is Contract; Every Interchange Between People is Contract;
All Commerce is Contract. Contract Makes the Law
Remember, anything that requires your signature, or a swearing thereto in order to give it application, is not law, but a contract. - Ron Branson (J.A.I.L. - Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
At common law, these eight elements are essential to the creation of a contract: offer, acceptance, intention, sufficient and equal consideration, mental and lawful capacity to contract, legality of purpose, genuine consent (knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily), certainty of terms and conditions.
You are usually tricked into contracting. I heard of a woman who was charged with writing ‘bad cheques’ and prior to sentencing was asked by the judge if she had anything to say. This is called, ‘allocution’ and is the time for the ‘defendant’ to say what’s so.
Unfortunately, most defendants fail to take advantage of this opportunity to set the record straight. She, however, told the judge, “With all due respect, I do not accept your sentence.” The judge then said, “I sentence you to 25 years.” Again she said, “I do not accept your sentence.” He called both attorneys, who were now visibly irate, to come forward.
The judge then asked, “Well, Ms. ... , would you think it kind of the court to sentence you to only 10 years?” Again she said she would not accept his sentence. The judge's final words, to the dismay of the attorneys were, “I hereby dismiss this case and all charges are dropped.” He couldn’t do anything without her agreement. This is the power of contracts.
By the way, it is impossible to write a ‘bad cheque’; there is no such thing. If it has a date, a $$$ amount, and an autograph it is a lawful commercial instrument because the funds are created by those three requirements. If it is kept by the corporate entity to which one has specified ‘credit/pay to the order of’, then it is clearly being used as such. Don’t let anyone tell you that you wrote a ‘bad cheque’. Sure, there might not have been debt funds in the account to cover it yet that doesn’t mean that the private side hasn’t been accessed. In fact, you can be certain that it has been if it weren’t returned to you and if it has been returned then keep in mind that a debt/legal tender (payment) offered in honour (in good faith) and refused, is a debt discharged. There is no commercial crime except on the part of the entity trying to charge you with ‘writing a bad cheque.’ Remember: A Promissory Note is a Promissory Note is a Promissory Note....... more later when I recount my latest adventures with RBC (Royal Bank of Canada) and CRA (which continues to change its name - so just remember it as the Canadian version of IRS).
An offer of contract becomes binding after 72 hours (3 days); after seven (7) days there is a default and after ten (10) days there is a summary judgement. So handle your offers immediately.
The basis of 99% of all legal actions is derived from a ‘person’ (strawman) being sued, or accused of having entered into and breached a commercial contract, or being presumed to have entered into and breached a commercial contract. If the contract does not meet the four legal requirements, it is void. In orderto live free we must remain eternally vigilant of these invisible contracts and avoid the presumption of their existence. The most significant presumptions are:
1. that you are a resident;
2. that you depend upon the government for benefits;
3. that you are not responsible for your behaviour; and
4. that you need protection - an attorney, a financial advisor, a doctor, a fiat currency, etc.
(Protect me from the protectors.)
All the above are false presumptions, the existence of which is perpetuated upon the belief that all land and people are collateral for a debt which supports a fraudulent monetary system. All are based upon the presumption that certificates of ‘birth’/‘title’, etc., in commercial law, waive our right to take responsibility for our own affairs and own our bodies, plus life, liberty, and the property we accumulate through trading our labour with others or creating from raw materials, if we don’t object to or arrange our affairs otherwise. The PTB have established a long history (hundreds of years) of lending what is considered ‘money’ or‘credit’ and then calling in debts, and creating wars around the world over these debts.
Believe it or Not!
1. IRS/CRA is not a Government Agency. All Alphabet Agencies (CIA, DOT, etc.) are agencies of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) which is an agency of the UN.
2. SSNs/SINs are issued by the UN via the IMF, not by Social Security Administration or CRA
3. There are no Judicial courts and hence no ‘judges’ overseeing ‘law’. There are Executive Administrators enforcing Statutes and Codes.
4. You own no property; slaves can’t own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant.
5. The Revolutionary War was a fiction/fraud/ruse. The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary war.
6. America is a British Colony. Britain is owned by the Vatican.
7. The Pope can abolish any law in USA/CA. Pope’s laws are obligatory. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.
8. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing - not even what we think are our children.
9. The duty of the police is not to protect you; it is to protect the Corporation and arrest code-breakers.
10. Everything in CA/USA is For Sale: roads, bridges (yes, the Brooklyn Bridge is for sale), schools, hospitals, water, prisons, airports, etc.
11. Social Security/Insurance is not insurance; nor is there a Trust Fund holding it. The SS/SI cheque comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN
12. A 1040/ T1 (filing) form is for tribute paid to Britain - the interest on the bankruptcy.
13. We are enemies of the State pursuant to Trading with the Enemy Act, 1933
14. The Constitution cannot be used to ‘defend’ oneself as none of us is a party to it.
15. Can/Am is a British colony. CA/USA are private corporations, not territories.
16. The UN has financed the operations of CA/USA gov’t for over 50 years; it owns every man, woman, and child and also holds all the land in Can/Am in Fee Simple.
17. We do not owe ‘public/ national debt’ - we can discharge fictitious public obligations.
18. All wars are a scam/farce/fiction. USA/CA and other corporations were making loans to others all over the world during the Depression. USA financed the building of Germany’s infrastructure in the 1930s. All those who died defending their non-existent ‘countries’ died in vain. Switzerland is ‘neutral’ because this is where the Bank of International Settlements is located. Wars are simply a red herring to keep us believing that government is necessary.
Impeding Commerce, via Breach of Contract, is the only crime.
USA: 27 CFR 72.11- code of federal regulations defines Commercial Crimes as any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): “Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; forgery; counterfeiting; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marijuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime.”
ALL CRIME IS COMMERCIAL!!!
Peter McWilliams wrote, Ain’t No Crime If You Do about victimless crimes. “If there is no injured party, no deposable witness, no filed sworn complaint, how is it that the government gets away with charging you with a crime?”
It cannot even be said that the State has ever shown any disposition to suppress crime, but only tosafeguard its own monopoly of crime. -Albert Jay Nock
How to handle a bully:
1. pay him
2. obtain third party intervention
3. learn his rules and beat him at his own game
4. remove yourself
None of these heals the cause, yet sometimes the cause can’t be healed and treating the symptoms will only encourage the bully. What we need to do is remove ourselves from the bully.
Corporations and Corporate Entities
Corporations are for unlawful purposes, primarily to escape punishment for their crimes by placing the blame on a fictional organization responsible to no one. Their sole purpose is to shirk responsibility. One who incorporates or even those who join a corporation are doing it for the purpose of avoiding personal responsibility for their own lives. I realize this sounds harsh, yet take a look at the results for the evidence. When corporations are established with the power to declare themselves ‘bankrupt’ that makes them criminal. This is the situation of governments today. Corporations are legal fictions; that is, they do not exist except in the minds of men. A corporation, being a legal fiction, cannot think, it cannot act in any manner, it cannot even communicate with natural man, and for this reason it must have somebody to speak and act for it, and the lawyers have set themselves up for this task. The enormity of corporate enterprises is limited only by imagination and they are gold mines for the bar associations, which are corporations themselves. Only 6% of all corporations pay any tax whatsoever and the rest they get by taking our exemptions - think Enron - or passing their tax liability onto us, e.g.: in the form of sales tax/GST . Remember, living souls are not required to pay any tax whatsoever.
Powaquatsi (Powaq quatsi): life in transformation; a way of life or an entity which consumes the lifeforces of other entities in order to further its own life; e.g.: a corporation
Yet, the most common and insidious corporation by far is the one for which you are personally being held as surety. You have been tricked into this by the gov’t which created this corporation. Since all corporations are gov’t-created, we can surmise that the sole purpose of all corporations is to generate revenue for the World Bank. The corporation for which you are being held as surety is the one whose name resembles yours.
If you’ve ever worked for a major corporation, you’ve heard the constant lament about trying to save money for the corporation. Well, there is no money, and there is no corporation. So whatever they’re doing, they’re doing for entities which don’t exist, and at the expense of living souls. The real problem is that real living souls truly think that the corporation needs to save money and of course this is based upon the fear that if it meets its demise, through loss of some kind or another, then so will they. What corporate people need to do is walk away and privately contract out their talents. The wins to this are: no taxes withheld, SS/CP becomes optional, reduced tax (if you choose to file and use business deductions), control over time, etc. The benefits are endless. When the gov’t sends you a bill for taxes due and owing, you can’t‘pay’ it yet you can discharge it. A friend used to work for Rand Corporation. As soon as he quit they hired him as a consultant; his income doubled and his taxes were reduced to a third.
I always worked for agencies rather than hospitals because I was paid about 25% more by remaining somewhat independent. I’d ask the nurses on the ward why they didn’t do the same. “I want the benefits.”
I told them that with what I earned I could easily afford to handle any ‘emergency’ which might come up, and which probably wouldn’t, yet they are working 40 hours a week for peanuts in anticipation of their need for surgery. These were young women. Talk about “getting yourself with a good company.” They were enslaved. The longer they were there, the longer they would have to stay - in order to collect whatever they thought they might get when it was all over. I know people who can consciously say, “I can’t leave; I’ll lose all my benefits.” YIKES! They don’t see that there is NO benefit in staying. I’ll say it again, there’ll be no pensions when its time for my generation to collect - 10 years from now. Yet, this is good, better, and best news. More, later.
A corporation is an artificial, immortal individual. For an organization, e.g.: a church, seeking recognition of tax exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (and who knows what, in CRA), in order to be an ‘organization’ in the legal sense, it is necessary to incorporate. As soon as it incorporates it becomes a commercial entity and applies for and obtains an IRS 501(c)(3) status ruling
(remaining non-political and non controversial) and it retains its tax exempt status. Essentially, the state then runs the church. If you think your pastor/ rabbi/ priest/ minister can speak his mind, think again. Yet, churches are automatically exempt from Federal Income Tax. Contributions to churches are deductible by donors so why would a church apply for gov’t stamp of approval when it was already free? A church that is tax exempt is not a ‘tax exempt church’ but a religious organization which applies for corporate status thereby going from ‘lawful assembly of private citizens’ to that of a ‘legal gathering of public subjects’.
Religion is for people who are frightened of going to Hell; Spiritualism is for those who have alreadybeen there. -Gary Busey
“God never gives us more that we can handle.” I want whoever said that to have a chat with those desperate enough to have committed suicide.
The church teaches that thinking of extramarital sex (yet not doing it) is the same as doing it; however, thinking about putting money into the collection plate (yet not doing it) is not the same as doing it. - Red Pritchard, 1973
There is nothing to fear about the imminent collapse of the global financial prison. -David Icke
Model Emergency Health Powers Act
Needless to say, this has nothing to do with health; it has to do with gov’t control. Remember who owns your body, unless you have taken steps to secure it. Under this act:
1. you will have a mandatory vaccination or you will be charged with a crime
2. you will get a mandatory medical exam or you will be charged with a crime
3. doctors will give the exam or you will be charged with a crime
4. your property can be seized if there is “Reasonable Cause to Believe” that it may pose a public health hazard... it can be burned or destroyed and you will NOT have recourse or compensation.
This sort of thing is flying around the Internet and although I have no doubt that it is accurate, whoever wrote it sees this as attack as opposed to desperation on the part of those charged with collecting the interest on the loan. The only reason things are getting more and more threatening for us and our alleged ‘possessions’ is because the powers-that-be are under the gun to “collect, ... or else.” Remember, thegov’t and all its branches are solely revenue-collecting agencies. If you have private, legal title to your property, there is no way it can be confiscated; your property includes your body. When they issue warrants for bodies to come in and get vaccinated, remember they are referring to the bodies to which they have legal title and to which you have only equitable title. If you already have legal title to your body, you can provide the papers proving this. I am grateful that I knew, a decade in advance of my birthing my boys, that vaccines are killers and so neither of my boys is vaccinated - or circumcised - and of all the diseases deemed “normal childhood diseases” they caught only chicken pox.
The interest on fraudulent bonds also has to be created by more borrowing. The money supply has to be constantly expanded because the interest has to be paid. Interest on the bonds (national debt) is paid before any other gov’t expense. If not, the entire system will collapse. The debt can’t be reduced because when funds are paid to reduce the debt (buy back the bonds and retire them) the money disappears from circulation since it returns to from whence it came - nowhere. When there is no money, there is depression; the standard of living drops which is why there is no middle class any longer. This is why the debt must be ‘discharged’ as opposed to being ‘paid’, because it CAN NOT BE PAID.
You might be interested in Jim Trafficant’s speech on The Bankruptcy of the United States. Look it up -he tells the entire story, which is why he is in jail - but the feds won’t admit to that.
A country [corporation] which has dangled the sword of nuclear holocaust over the world for half a century and claims that someone else invented terrorism is a country [corporation] out of touch with reality. -John K. Stoner.
I swore I wouldn’t mention George Bush in this book ..... He claims that his country [corporation] (the one which has been at war for every year of the past 53) is the most peace-loving country on earth.
There must be a remedy. Since we are operating in commerce, the remedy must be found in the Uniform Commercial Code. Remember:
1. signing the application for a licence is voluntary. You have the right to do these normal activities without such applications;
2. the applications are for ‘benefits’, ‘privileges’, and ‘opportunities’, which justify denial of your Creator-given rights with which you were born, but which were transferred upon birth registration;
3. we cannot acquire ‘true’ or ‘allodial title’ to any property purchased with such applications. We must ‘buy’ property in order to obtain ‘legal title’. This can be done only by exchanging your exemption for title. You can not own property by paying for it;
4. we cannot pay our debts at law; we can only discharge our debts in equity.
Filing a PPSA/UCC-1 is rather like the husband putting an ad in the local newspaper (usually the case and not the other way around) stating he is no longer responsible for his wife’s debts. This reminds me of the husband who didn’t report his wife’s credit card as stolen because the thief was spending less than she had been spending. So, the filing is stating something similar: I will no longer be held as the surety for the public debts of the Strawman because I am now creditor to, have a superior lien against, a security interest in, and control of, the Debtor Strawman. I had no trouble filing with the States of WA or NM, yet Alberta didn’t really want me to file a PPSA so they kept returning it along with the cheque I sent for filing fees until I woke up and remembered who I am. Since they are my servants, I realized that all I had to do is ‘Notice’ them that the document is registered with Canada Post. They are not required to file it if it didn’t suit their fancy, yet, my records show they received it and it has been recorded - rather the same as my car - it is not ‘registered’; it is ‘recorded’. We are to Notice, not request, our public servants to do our bidding.
Does the master of the house ask the servants to do something? No, he kindly and politely Notices them.
The Financing Statement is the one contract in the world which can not be broken. Since we have unlimited credit with the Fed we can access it through an account. Remember there is no money so it is not as if you can mosy over to the FRB/BC and get cash. This is for the discharge of public debt only. We are intending to remove ourselves from needing cash so you don’t want to add to the problem by accumulating more. We now control the funds so that the Feds will move figures, entries, and digits for our benefit - no longer for their benefit. By properly filing a Financing Statement (UCC-1/PPSA) we can become the holder in due course of the Strawman. When we are charged, we can simply discharge the charge with our tax exemption. This is commerce - not law. None of the charade. We simply accept the charge for value and return it for discharge, settlement, and closure. Since the claim is pre-paid and our account at the Fed is exempt from levy, the alleged debt goes away - sort of - at least until we have something with which to pay it. Since any control, which any alleged authority has over you, comes from your giving it, I suggest you never inadvertently grant jurisdiction to any court or any public entity. Remember who you are.
A ‘judge’ once asked me if I understood the charge (traffic). I told him we couldn’t proceed until he proved he had jurisdiction over me (I knew he had jurisdiction over the Strawman as I had yet to file my UCC 1). He just sat there stunned. Silence.
Advantages of filing a UCC / PPSA
Once we file a Financing Statement we can ‘discharge’ any public claim presented to us. If we ‘honour’ the claim by accepting it, we can discharge it. If we ‘dishonour’ the claim (by resisting, fighting, ignoring, arguing) we create a controversy which must be taken into court for resolution. ‘Accepting’ doesn’t mean acquiescing; it means we now control the offer. E.g.: If you have paid the bank $10,000 on a vehicle you think you own and you get behind in the payments, the bank can take the car away from you because you don’t own it. If you show on a Financing Statement that you have invested $10,000 into the vehicle and then got behind in payments, the bank would have to pay you the $10,000 before they take it.
The UCC in article 3, § 505 lists the rights of a party presented with a demand for payment, no matter who the alleged claimant, e.g.: IRS/CRA, or what the claim, e.g.: property tax/income tax. No one can ever
show a liability on your part, only a demand for $$$. This is how I have so much fun with the alleged creditors. They continue to send me statements; I continue to demand an invoice, signed under their full, commercial liability and I’ll be happy to settle the accounting, but they never do! To do so would be committing fraud. How can I pay a bill if they won’t send me one?
The Powers-That-Be - the Global Elite
The top 1% of the world has the same combined income as the bottom 57%, and the disparity is growing.
At the top of the decision-making pyramid we have the Ruling Elite. They utilize psycho politics deliberately to influence all nine steps in the decision-making process. They control every step by:
1. Creating events and predetermining their outcome;
2. Manufacturing event details and controlling the information dissemination infrastructure;
3. Biasing the alarm faculties of common people by the selected dissemination of controlled information;
4. Molding knowledge and belief systems through ‘education’;
5. Intentionally providing the children of common people with inferior education through public instruction while Ruling Elite children attend premier schools and colleges;
6. Controlling the emotions of common people through social rhetoric and religious dogma;
7. Enacting rules and regulations that influence common peoples’ decisions based upon expected rewards and feared punishments;
8. Intimidating the decisions of ordinary people by enforcing codes, rules, and regulations with coercion, the threat of force, torture, fines, or imprisonment; and,
9. Erecting surveillance networks which have the ability to monitor the behaviors and actions of groups and individuals.
We will see neither our retirement investments nor our pensions. Do not get plugged in; this is good news. It means the economic structure under which we have been living is about to collapse, and about bloody time. Yes, there will be some casualties, but for the most part, it will wake us up to know that there is no security outside ourselves.
A few years ago I took the advice of a friend who was encouraging me to get into the commodities market and buy ‘March coffee’. At every turn I was stymied. I could not get anything to go the way I wanted. With each passing week, the window of opportunity narrowed and my final exasperation came when the fax machine wouldn’t fax the order. I finally said, “Someone doesn’t want me to buy this trade.”
I emailed my broker complaining that everything was holding me up: Christmas holidays, bankers, wrong telephone numbers, faxes, inability to get hold of my friend to ask for the stop date, etc.
He wrote back and said, “Patience, my dear. If you had bought when you intended, you’d be down $2500”. I knew this wasn’t possible since the worst I could have done was a loss of $1400; nevertheless I went to the trade website and saw that had I bought March coffee, I’d have been out of the market for a nickel and lost my investment. I laughed so hard I couldn’t stand up. Unfortunately, my friend, who had bought while I was horsing around not knowing what I was doing, lost a chunk of funds.
This was my final lesson in ‘there are no investments’, well, there are investments, but there are no returns of substance. The investment game is one which is run by the elite to get our funds. We can’t possibly win. Its like going to Las Vegas. If you’re going for any reason other than entertainment, you’re putting your faith into something that doesn’t exist. I’m willing to concede that many have made the proverbial killing in the market, yet they fail to see that what they have gained is a liability. Even more important is they haven’t yet met the living soul who lost in order for them to win. I finally learned that I don’t have to become financially secure; I must forgive myself for thinking that I ought to become so - particularly because it is an impossibility.
Sixty per cent (60%) of the stock market is the investments of the CAFR (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report) accounts of cities. This is where your funds from traffic tickets, property taxes, etc. go - to fund the gambling of the city officials. They are investing with our funds and winning; then they hide it in a CAFR account and then cry that they don’t have enough $$$ to pay for emergency services - firemen, paramedics, etc.
A woman I know is quite panicky about her future and states, “Well, at least I have my company pension when I’m 65.” I laugh (almost as hard as when I’m told I ought to be saving for my children’s college education. That’s 3 years from now and the economy will be so vastly changed by then, it will be unrecognizable, not to mention that I don’t want my children programmed any more than they already are via ‘higher education’). So, where does my friend think she’s going to find this corporation which will have already absconded with her alleged pension? It is a fiction; it doesn’t exist; nor does its alleged assets.
Four (4!) people have said to me, “My pension is ‘locked in’.” Chortle. The reason we have the corporate scams (like Enron) these days is because of bad bookkeeping. This is their only crime. There are no funds to steal; what they have stolen is the exemption of their (former) employees. Even after you leave the job the corporation continues to use your exemption because they have your SSN/SIN. The real question is, why haven’t the employees themselves been using their exemptions and not leave them lying around for the crooked corporations to steal? Bush’s ostensible upset about cracking down on corporate greed (what a skit!) is not to punish them but to remind them to clean up their act before the sheeple catch on that they’re cooking the books. Since there is no money it is only credit/ assets which they’re stealing by juggling the liability side of the accounts which they can do because the people have turned over their exemptions to them. The cat is out of the bag. These corporations are in for a big surprise.
Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government. - Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
Bush is in place for only one purpose: to get the American people to give up the last of their few remaining rights.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. - Thomas Jefferson
Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its powers, but the truth is ... the Fed (Federal Reserve System) has usurped the government. It controls everything here (congress) and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will. - Louis McFadden, ex- Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency
The course of history shows as a government grows, liberty decreases. - Thomas Jefferson
In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, it was planned that way. - FDR
Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take away everything you have. - Thomas Jefferson
Government is at best a petulant servant and at worst a tyrannical master. - George Washington
Unfortunately, many people think the ‘American Government’ are the terrorists. There is NO American Government and hasn’t been in scores of years. To what they refer is USG, the belligerent foreign corporation masquerading as ‘the American Government’. It has named itself The Government of the United States of America for the sole purpose of conning the American people into believing that it represents them and that it is its government. The USG, a private, fictitious, for-profit corporation, has no more to do with the American people or the American territory than does SEARS, another private, fictitious, for-profit corporation. ‘Americans’, which includes those of us in Canada, have long been subjected to the terrorism of the corporations USG and Government of Canada. No one alive today has experienced a representative government which brings us to another point. Why would anyone vote in a foreign election for a foreign corporation. There is no one for whom to vote who could possibly represent us. Our countryhas been under siege for so long I wonder if we will ever get it back.
Gouvernement - Canada
The Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms does not apply to Canadians. Remember the four elements of a valid legal contract: 1) full disclosure, 2) equal consideration, 3) lawful terms and conditions, 4) signatures of all parties. Is your signature on it? No, you are not a party to it. Since CANADA is a corporation, the Charter is precisely that - a charter for a LLC (limited liability corporation) not a contract involving you because corporations can’t contract; only living souls can contract.
The Constitution is a body of law, written by the state, in order to control the government. The CAG is controlled by a belligerent, foreign, fictional corporation called the Anglican Church, and known as the British Crown. ‘Their’ Constitution does not apply to the people of the land mass known as Canada. It applies, just as every other code, rule, regulation, ordinance, and statute applies, only to the Crown’s employees - namely the federal and provincial governments and all their employees - and to anyone who chooses to volunteer. See ‘application of charter’ in Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 32. (1)This Charter applies:
a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. As none of us signed this contract it doesn’t apply to us. Our ‘charter rights’ are violated with impunity by the privately-owned Anglican Church legal system franchise known as the BAR Association via the Vatican and British Crown. There is a difference between the CAG and the USG: the feds in Canada not only call themselves ‘civil servants’ but also believe, maybe, they truly are the servants of the people and hence it is easier for them to understand that the Canadian people truly are sovereign - maybe. Even though Americans are more inherently sovereign than Canadians, the feds in the US are nowhere near as likely to admit it.
Government - America
There were only 4 purposes of government:
1) to provide a military to protect the American Republics;
2) to monitor commerce/trade among the Republics;
3) to maintain the overall welfare for ALL (not just certain groups or individuals);
4) to govern international commerce of the union.
The Bill of Rights dictates the limitations of government. The people of the united States of America never had ‘Constitutional Rights’, they had a government with limitations in order to preserve their ‘natural’ rights. Alas, no more.
Socialism: gov’t controls publicly owned utilities (railroads, post, communications, etc.)
Fascism: the people ‘own’ but the gov’t controls everything.
Communism: gov’t owns and controls ALL productivity;
Since the name on the deed for your house is a government-created NAME, the government owns your house. You’ll notice that this set-up falls into the last definition: Communism
The sole objective of the Global Elite is to create an Economic Slave Force -“an economic system owned by the workers and controlled by the state, economic growth and planning controlled by a central authority, corporations and their stocks regulated by the gov’t, private FRB controlling interest rates and income tax, and political control by an authoritative party” - FDR.
They must distract the people with inane subjects, like sports, politics (thinking there is any difference among party leaders), via TV, so that they don’t notice what’s really going on.
The first plank of the communist manifesto is: abolition of private property. The agenda of the Global Elite is to steal land, control families, education, religion, implement a central private bank, promote immoral behaviour, and eliminate countries and nationalities. DONE!
The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes. -Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952
I am concerned for the security of our great nation, not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within. — General Douglas MacArthur
the 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto
1. Abolition of private property
2. Heavy progressive income tax
3. Abolition of all rights to inheritance
4. Confiscation of property of all emigrants and rebels
5. A Central bank
6. Government control of Communications and Transportation
7. Government ownership of factories and agriculture
8. Government control of labour
9. Corporate farms, regional planning
10. Free education for all children in government controlled schools
We have been communized in that: production in relation to consumption must be ruthlessly regulated or ..... the fraud upon the public, perpetuated by bank credit, will be revealed. - American’s Bulletin
The ‘state’ holds securities on your body, land, business, marriage, children, auto, etc. .. communism, because state holds the title, state makes the laws, and the communist state keeps track of your benefits and duties through a system of accounting, not through service and love.
Of the 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto, ALL 10 have been implemented. Women have beentricked into thinking they have the ‘right’ to work (#8), when in fact it has become a bloody necessity because of (#2) the heavy progressive income tax.
Democracy is indispensable to Socialism. - V. I. Lenin
Socialism leads to Communism. - Karl Marx
Thus, the lower class is taking down (strictly feeds off) the middle-class slaves. The upper-class benefits from its corporate profit from the same slave-force. ‘Corporations’ (creatures of the State) have replaced ‘Companies’ (private with no gov’t control) and ‘Human Resources Departments’ have replaced ‘Personnel Departments’ in the work place.
The federal government has its hands in nearly 50% of the Gross National Product (GNP). 25 years ago it was 10%. Under the guise of a Free-Market Capitalist System, Communism has arrived.
It is a perfect absurdity to suppose that gov’t would ever take our money, without our consent, under the guise of protecting us. It cannot reasonably be supposed that anyone will voluntarily pay money to the terrocrats who masquerade as ‘the government’, for the purpose of securing his protection, unless he first makes an explicit and purely voluntary contract with them for that purpose. -Lysander Spooner
When the USG/CAG cries ‘foul’ about anything it chooses, under the guise of ‘national security’, it is never for the sake of the ‘nation’, or the people of the nation, or the territory of the nation; it is for the sake of the ‘security of the corporation’ - their own private club. Its members think only of protecting its own interests, not those of the land mass or its people.
‘Necessity’ is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. -Wm. Pitt, 1783
Everything the state says is a lie. -Nietzsche
Every government is run by liars and nothing they say should be believed. - I. F. Stone
The average man does not want to be free. He simply wants to be safe. ~ H. L. Mencken
What we do to make ourselves safe eventually creates the situation for our demise. -R. Moss
One who trades freedom for security deserves neither. - Ben Franklin
The nature of psychological compulsion is such that those who act under constraint remain under the impression that they are acting on their own initiative. The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free. That he is not free is apparent only to other people. His servitude is strictly objective. - Aldous Huxley - BraveNew World Revisited, 1958
The problem with knowledge is that there is no going back - like taking the Red Pill in the Matrix. Do I want to exchange my freedom for an easier life as a good slave? Our freedom will ultimately depend upon whether we contract away our rights or remain aware of the nature of benefits implying the existence of a contract, and by our failing to object to the presumption of a contract.
‘Freedom’ is not the easiest road - yet we may be more satisfied with ourselves for having taken it.
Your ability to ‘choose’ is what constitutes your freedom. If we were ever to live in harmony, politicians and bureaucrats would have to confine their lives to minding their own business and deriving what benefit they could from those who chose to co-operate with them. Life belongs to the living, not to the State or any other non-existent abstraction. - B. Shaffer
There is no one so hopelessly enslaved as he who falsely believes he is free. - Goethe
If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too. - W. S. Maugham
It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. - Voltaire
The marvel of all history is the patience with which men and women submit to burdens unnecessarily laid upon them by their governments. - William H. Borah
We must actively challenge the publicly accepted scope of government authority. -unknown
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. - Thomas Jefferson
The ultimate authority ... resides in the people alone... -James Madison, Federalist Paper No. 46
I never would have agreed to the formulation of the Central Intelligence Agency back in '47 , if I had known it would become the American Gestapo. -- Harry S. Truman (1961)
We must make our choice between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. If we can prevent the government from wasting the labours of the people under the pretense of caring for them, they will behappy. - Thomas Jefferson
The standard of living of the average American has to decline ... I don't think you can escape that. - Paul Volcker, former Federal Reserve Chairman
If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks ... will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. - Thomas Jefferson
A few who can understand the system (check money and credits) will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favors, that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of the people mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear it's burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests. -Rothschild Brothers of London
What, Me Work?
One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that one’s work is terribly important. -Bertrand Russell
Commerce is a game only the banksters can win. They have programmed us to believe that the more money we have the better life can be - so now men work two jobs and every woman under 50 thinks she ought to be ‘working’. I never intended to work; I never fell for the ‘women want a career’ nonsense. I’ve never met a woman who isn’t angry and I contend this is why. Many women went into the work force believing they could change the world, that the world would be a more pleasant place to be if there were less testosterone in the powerful positions. Unfortunately, the women who rose to those positions became men.
They donned the three-piece suits and in fact made the problem worse. The only thing worse than men running the world is women who think they are men running the world. What women want is a safer and happier world for their children to grow up, yet the result was they were conned into spending their days away from their children.
On the last day I worked as an RN I got into my car and heard, “you will no longer slave-labour for the genocidal pharmaceutical industry and medical mafia”. I had long felt unethical about poisoning the old folks so this was perfect. It crossed my mind that I still had two work days scheduled so I intended to keep my commitment, however, as it turned out, through nothing I did or did not, that day was indeed my last.
I had allowed my RN ‘licence’ to lapse. I refused to submit any longer to extortion - “obtaining money by compulsion or threat”(Oxford English Dictionary) - or to a licence - “permission to do that which is otherwise prohibited”. (OED) AARN is a corporation which will not permit me to work as an RN unless I pay it a fee; that’s extortion. RNs are required to pay yearly fees which in 2001 in Alberta cost me approximately six (6) days of labour - a total of $900 Cdn./$600 USD (a full year’s fee for the 7 months I worked prior to the next year’s fee, both of which came within the same calendar year, along with union dues of $400. The union, by the way, refused to assist me in getting wage compensation of $6 per hour for my 25 years experience. I was working for only 75% of my entitled wage). Taking care of the infirm is now illegal without a permit. What compassionate entity conjured this? This is corporate/ bankster thinking at its best. I never went back and I never looked back. They wonder why there is a‘shortage of nurses’.
Minimum wage is a huge joke and no one could live on it. These jobs are for kids in school who still live at home and who want some cash for the weekend. It is not designed for those who are intending to‘earn their living’, and yet many are grateful that they have these worthless jobs because most of what used to be ‘good jobs’ have been exported out of America. Never have more people been out of work - not even during the Great Depression.
After many years of my being concerned about $$$, I finally had to face the truth which is that I’ve never had to worry about ‘money’. I’ve always had cash. ALWAYS. I quit trying to figure it out. I don’t really know how this can be, since, over the same 35 year period that my colleagues have worked and saved for their retirements, I estimate I’ve actually ‘worked’ only one quarter of that time. I have never worked full time, except for 2 brief periods in my twenties, both of which were less than a year. There have been entire years during which I haven’t worked and this is not including when my boys were young and I was being financially supported by their father. I wonder how I’ve managed to survive.
I’m not suggesting I did it all on my own; I am suggesting that I’ve never had to worry about $$$ and it is not due to my having worked hard all my life. While it is true that no woman works harder for her money than when she marries it, this was very short-lived. I attribute much of it to learning the credit card scam, probably worth $90,000 to me. Cash has just always had a major presence in my life - not so much that I can take year-long trips around the world or live in the lap of luxury, and, I’ve never owned my own house, but then ..... neither have you. You’ve just worked to pay for one. From a psychological perspective, I say I am better off - at least I know it and I am not deluding myself. No one can take anything from me - I have nothing to take and that which I do have I know how to protect.
You’ve heard stories of wives who go off to work and, after commute/clothing/childcare expenses along with what the gov’t confiscates in income tax, the family is actually farther behind in net income. What were they thinking? I have enough trouble with the concept of anyone ‘working’ but particularly women. Their job is huge enough in life; - that of dragging their men from the ‘world’ into the spiritual realm. I haven’t even touched upon the time and energy consumption of minding children and creating a home.
My divorced friend had to pay tax on her husband’s child support payments, which he got to ‘writeoff’ as an expense, but she, who desperately needed the extra funds, got to hand over the bulk of it in tax.
Something’s wrong, yet this is no surprise to anyone. So why are women working? I am reminded of the woman who left a note on the refrigerator for her husband. “Supper’s in the oven; I’ve gone to law school -I’ll be back in 4 years.”
When the simple truth about banking is revealed, we’ll see that the economic effect of their stealing and counterfeiting has meant that wives must work for the family to survive. If the banking problem is corrected, wives will have the option to stop working while keeping the same standard of living or working and doubling the family's wealth. If enough of us learn about the fraudulent banking system our loans could be forgiven or discharged, the government's budget balanced, and the personal IRS/CRA tax cut to zero with no other taxes. If the banks paid their debt, we could all be out of debt.
The amount of credit the feds earned from investing in securities the credit borrowed from us via the registration of our births has pre-paid anything you might ever want or need. We are the creditors, and the federal mafia is the debtor. They owe us interest for using our credit, yet, since they (the Public) are bankrupt, there is no ‘substance money’ so we, as creditors, will have to get paid by taking equity, in the form of our houses and cars, as the ‘set-off’ - the balancing of the account. They owe us interest on our credit which they are using to pay for the manufacturing of all the goods and services we are buying. We have already paid for the product before we buy it. We are still the principals of the securities because said investment was never disclosed to us. The feds are hoping we won’t request the profits of our investments, however, if and when we do, it is substantial enough that we would never have to work again. We could never spend it all.
WE DO NOT NEED, NOR WERE WE EVER MEANT, TO ‘WORK FOR A LIVING’
The government floated a bond against our future earnings by using our birth registrations as the collateral for our ‘promise to pay’. Income tax is just their having ‘educated’ you to pay the interest on the loan YOU lent THEM. When we access our Direct Treasury Accounts, those held at the BC/FRB underour SINs/SSNs, we will no longer ‘have to’ work. Meanwhile, we will continue to:
1. slave-labour for entities which do not exist except for the purpose of profit,
2. do something other than what we were designed to do, and
3. believe that we (extensions of our Creator) are worthless enough to have to pay for our existence.
Our life’s labour and everything we’ve created, have become the legal, commercial collateral of the bankrupt USA/CA Inc.
The feds give us back from our labour just enough to keep us convinced that we are actually earning enough of a living to buy what we want, when what is true is that most of us cannot afford what we think we want; and even if we truly did want what we think we want, it is already pre-paid.
So, not only are we not supposed to be working for anyone (banksters) or anything (corporations) other than for each other and for our own enjoyment but also we already have enough credit to buy anything we want or need; we have just been, so far, prevented from accessing it. Since that is what ALL currency is today – our credit – it ought to be easy to realize that we can use our OWN credit - credit from our exemption, not credit which only creates more debt.
Think what would happen to the banksters if we all suddenly had everything we wanted. They would lose their control over us. We wouldn’t need to work, nor worry about ‘paying the bills’, nor believe that there was any authority outside ourselves. (We are an extension of, not separate from, our Creator.) It is our concern and worries over ‘money’ which allow them control over us. How could the powers-that-be - those who are running the world in what seems to be about as disastrous a manner as can be - continue to do what they want to do, e.g.: WAR? There would be no more slave-labour. We would all be working at something that is way more fun. It is said that if we all ‘worked’ at doing what we wanted, all necessary jobs would get done. The remainder, the manufacture of WMD, for example, would either cease to get done or the powers-that-be would have to do it themselves. What a concept! What an interesting place to live this world might become!
If you want to make someone angry, tell him a lie; if you want to make him furious, tell him the truth.
So, at the risk of infuriating you, isn’t it strange to think that all these years you have been working for what you wanted and unbeknownst to you, everything you ever purchased from every corporation was already paid for. All you had to do was go and claim it, sign for it, and take it home; and this includes your home - it too was prepaid. You never had to work a day in your life to ‘pay for’ anything. All these years you could have been playing and doing what you love to do. We were conned into getting a good education so we could get a good job; all based upon the presumption that this is what we wanted. Would you work as hard as you do if you knew that nothing, which you think you own, belongs to you?
Go to Installment IV of IV
NOTICE: not affiliated with Freedom School.
NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today. Thank you.
Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
Freedom School information served for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to unlawful action. Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable.
The noteworthy failure of the government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and third parties affiliated or otherwise. If the government wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements that are not factual appearing on this website are in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. §556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
Presentation Copyright© 2007, 2018
All Rights Reserved