Consider that its all about jurisdiction / (subjugation) / control.

Consider law as written is perfect, it is what we have to go with
- it is just a matter of -
is one subject to it, or not -- and that's called, jurisdiction.

Knowledge of the Law = FREEDOM

At the close of the Constitutional Convention Franklin was asked, “what kind of government have you wrought for us?”
He replied, “...a Republican form of government if you can keep it.”

And as he was listening nearby
George Washington said, “and in order to keep it every man must know the law.”

When Abraham Lincoln studied law in his cabin what law books was he studying?
He was studying books on the Common Law supplied to him by mail order.
Are you aware -- Statutory and equity law now taught in universities did not come about
until Rockefeller financed its propagation beginning in the early 1900's -
to serve his corporate purposes.

STARE DECISIS
(As found in Black's Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition (1957), pages 1577-78.)
"Federal courts should in all instances follow the law of the state with respect to the construction of state statutes, and where that law has been determined by the courts of last resort, their decisions are "stare decisis" and must be followed, irrespective of federal courts' opinions concerning what the law ought to be, but with respect to the pronouncement of other state courts, federal courts are not so bound and may conclude that the decisions does not truely express the state law. Kethaya v. Axton, D.C.N.Y., 32 F.Supp. 266,268."

STARE DECISIS
"Stare decisis is the policy of the court to stand by precedent; the term is but an abbreviation of stare decisis et quieta non movere — "to stand by and adhere to decisions and not disturb what is settled." Consider the word "decisis." The word means, literally and legally, the decision. Nor is the doctrine stare dictis; it is not "to stand by or keep to what was said." Nor is the doctrine stare rationibus decidendi — "to keep to the rationes decidendi of past cases." Rather, under the doctrine of stare decisis a case is important only for what it decides — for the "what," not for the "why," and not for the "how." Insofar as precedent is concerned, stare decisis is important only for the decision, for the detailed legal consequence following a detailed set of facts."
United States Internal Revenue Serv. v. Osborne (In re Osborne), 76 F.3d 306, 96-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) paragr. 50,185 (9th Cir. 1996)

"when a later decision of this court conflicts with one of our prior published decisions, we are still bound by the holding of the earlier case." Darrah v. City of Oak Park, 255 F.3d 301, 310 (6th Cir. 2001)

we are still bound by the holding of the earlier case. Sowards v. Loudon County, Tenn., 203 F.3d 426, 431 n. 1 (6th Cir.2000)

Gary Lawson, "The Constitutional Case Against Precedent", 17 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 23, 24 (1994).
Gary Lawson, "Mostly Unconstitutional: The Case Against Precedent Revisited," 5 Ave Maria L. Rev. 1 (2007).
Jon Roland, How stare decisis Subverts the Law — Column: Jun. 10, 2000.
Jon Roland, Principles of Constitutional Interpretation

"Gee judge, are you saying that this court has the ability to overturn a higher court's decision?"

Texas Code Of Criminal Procedure, Art. 15.01

State Legal Resources

Index of Federal, State and Local  Government Fraud Files

Texas Rules of Civil Proceedure on-line

1902: Texas Notary Protest Manual  1902

Good resource for  NOTARY PROTEST

Civil RICO 18 U.S.C. § 1961-1968 A Manual for Federal Attorneys

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act,
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1961-1968  explained

"U.S. Attorneys" NOT "U.S.A. Attorneys"

See also,   Competent Counsel Questionaire

Bureaucrats Never Have a Case

ARE LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW?

Proof That An Attorneys Retainer Is A Rip Off

WHAT IS A LICENSE?

Excuse me, as I am aware... (and, may I bring this to the court´s attention...)
"An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness".
"Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not sufficient for motion to dismiss or for summary judgment,"
"Where there are no depositions, admissions, or affidavits the court has no facts to rely on for a summary determination."
as found in, Trinsey v. Pagliaro, D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647
(pag lee air e o)

"Attorneys can't testify; statements of counsel in brief or in oral argument are not facts before the court."
as found in, United States v. Lovable, 431 U.S. 783, 97 S. 2004, 52 L.Ed.2d 752 and Gonzales v. Buist, 224 U.S. 126 (1912)

A Corporation cannot sue the living man, PERIOD.
They don´t want you to know this! SMILE!
See, Rundle v. DELAWARE & RARITAN CANAL CO. (1853)

The general rule is that any statement by a witness or in a document that reports a fact asserted by someone
who is not in court subject to cross-examination is inadmissible hearsay!
If you don´t object it will hurt you every time!
"Excuse me - it - appears as hearsay."
Hearsay is a statement made by a person not in court, offered to prove the truth of the fact asserted.

With Regards to  Trinsey v. Pagliaro

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges
"When the republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous"
--Publius (or Gaius) Cornelius Tacitus (ca. 56 – ca. 117) a senator and a historian of the Roman Empire.

Did someone say, "HJR 192"?

  House Joint Resolution (HJR)192

Disscussion on House Joint Resolution 192  and its legal effect

  NOTICE OF MEMORANDUM OF LAW POINTS AND
AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL BILL OF EXCHANGE

  Liberty Tree, Vol. 10, No. 6, May 2008

TRANSMITTING UTILITY defined

  Proof That There Is a "Straw Man"

coram nobis   "in our presence"   a writ of error.
coram vobis   "in your presence"   a writ of error.

VIDEO: The Court of Public Relations

A Casebook for Dealing with Extremist Legal Arguments: Idiot Legal Arguments

Classification of a cause of action as to whether it seeks a remedy "at law" or "in equity" remains important for several reasons of general significance:
(1) equitable remedies are generally enforceable by contempt while legal remedies are not;
(2) generally, litigants do not have a right to a jury trial to obtain equitable relief, whereas in many cases a right to a jury trial attaches to the suits "at law"; and
(3) "equitable relief is discretionary."
DAN B. DOBBS, DOBBS LAW OF REMEDIES, Vol. One at 11-12, 56-57 (West Publ’g Co. 2d ed. 1993).

Gee, someone say, "contempt"?

Corpus Juris Secundum

The Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.) is an encyclopedia of U.S. law.
Its full title is
Corpus Juris Secundum: Complete Restatement Of The Entire American Law As Developed By All Reported Cases (1936- )
It contains an alphabetical arrangement of legal topics as developed by U.S. federal and state cases (1658-date).

C.J.S. Guides: guide 1   guide 2

The Temples Of Baal

* * * PUBLIC SERVANT QUESTIONNAIRE * * *

When you look around the web, you'll find a public servant questionnaire, but not like this one. I converted it to a single page so you can get a multi-part NCR form made up at Kinkos, Staples, Office Depot, etc.. Keep some by the door to your house and in your glove compartment to give to [any] law enforcement officers who want to ask you questions. Before answering theirs, I can make them answer mine. You'll find supporting law in 5 U.S.C. 552a. By Bob Hurt

If an Agent Knocks

Attorney's views of government abuse -  tort or treason?

Question to the judge: "Excuse me, am I entitled to know the nature and cause of the accusation against me?"

Judge: Yes

"Well then before we go forward I need to know, to be made aware of the
nature and cause of the accusation against me."

[nature is either civil or criminal / cause is either common law  (show damaged party) or admiralty (show contract.]

See also,   Competent Counsel Questionaire

I have authority...

American Legal System Is Corrupt Beyond Recognition, Judge Tells Harvard Law School

Chief Justice Marshall, in the course of the debates of the Virginia State Convention of 1829--1830 (pp. 616, 619), used the following strong and frequently quoted language: 'The Judicial Department comes home in its effects to every man's fireside; it passes on his property, his reputation, his life, his all. Is it not, to the last degree important, that he should be rendered perfectly and completely independent, with nothing to influence or control him but God and his conscience? * * * I have always thought, from my earliest youth till now, that the greatest scourge an angry Heaven ever inflicted upon an ungrateful and a sinning people, was an ignorant, a corrupt, or a dependent Judiciary.' In a very early period of our history, it was said, in words as true to-day as they were then, that ' if they (the people) value and wish to preserve their Constitution, they ought never to surrender the independence of their judges.'  O'Donoghue v. United States, 289 U.S. 516, 532 (1933).

Scandal in Louisiana's Criminal Courts
In a suicide note, reflections on guilt

Joint Resolution authorizing and requesting the President to proclaim 1983 as the “Year of the Bible.”  Public Law 97-280

VIDEO: How To Make a Judge Run Out Of The Court Room

# 1. I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows.
I ask humbly for Remedy.

# 2. I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows.
Your honor I humbly ask for cure and maintenance.

# 3. Your honor I wish to establish that I am a living being.
The flesh lives and the blood flows and we are sovereign and nothing stands between myself and the divine.

"THE STATE OF TEXAS"  fact or fiction?

In Texas "Peace officer" means a person elected, employed, or appointed as a peace officer under Article 2.12, Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 51.212 or 51.214, Education Code, or other law.

Don't Share That Law! It's Copyrighted    He's giving you access, one document at a time

Scott Henson: Welcome to Texas justice: You might beat the rap, but you won't beat the ride.  Grits for Breakfast

Bottom line:
How can we call ourself a free people and teach our children that they too are free,
when the government that we created to protect our freedoms,
funds itself and provides its services at the point of a gun?

Freedom-School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
This enterprise collectively is known and generally presented as "Freedom-School.com" - "we," "us" or "our" are other expressions of Freedom-School.com used throughout. "You" is in reference to the user / visitor.

This is the fine print that´s so important. Freedom School material and other information served is so for educational purposes only, no liability expressed or assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to or condone unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and
defend all Law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for [those] men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance. Support is not offered.

Freedom School is a free speech site, non-commercial enterprise and operation as
there is no charge for things presented.
Freedom-School.com site relies on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.

The noteworthy failure of [the] government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and any and all [third] parties affiliated or otherwise. THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC AGREEMENT AND IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT, EQUIVALENT TO A SIGNED, WRITTEN CONTRACT BETWEEN PARTIES - If the government, or anyone else, wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements appearing on this website are not factual or otherwise in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. § 556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.

Freedom-School.com is not responsible for content of any linked website or material.
In addition, users may not use Freedom-School.com to engage in, facilitate or further unlawful conduct;
use the service in any way, or manner, that harms us or anyone connected with us or whose work is presented;
damage, disable, overburden, or impair the service (or the network(s) connected to the site)
or interfere with anyone´s use and enjoyment of the website.

All claims to be settled on the land - Austin, Travis county Texas, united States of America, using Texas Common Law.
All parts of this contract apply to the maximum extent permitted by law. A court may hold that we cannot enforce a part of this contract as written. If this happens, then you and we will replace that part with terms that most closely match the intent of the part that we cannot enforce. The rest of this contract will not change. This is the entire contract between you and us regarding your use of the service. It supersedes any prior contract or statements regarding your use of the Freedom-School.com site. If there exists some manner of thing missing we do not forfeit our right to that thing as
we reserve all rights.
We may assign, or modify, alter, change this contract, in whole or in part, at any time with or without notice to you. You may not assign this contract, or any part of it, to any other person. Any attempt by you to do so is void. You may not transfer to anyone else, either temporarily or permanently, any rights to use the Freedom-School.com site or material contained within.

Use of this system constitutes consent to monitoring, interception, recording, reading, copying or capturing by authorized personnel of all activities. There is no right to privacy in this system. Unauthorized use of this system is prohibited and subject to criminal and civil penalties, including all penalties applicable to willful unauthorized access. Consider, 18 U.S.Code §1030 - Fraud and related activity in connection with computers.

GOOGLE ANALYTICS: While we do not automatically collect personally identifiable information about you when you visit the Freedom-School.com site, we do collect non-identifying and aggregate information that we use to improve our Web site design and our online presence.
Visitors to this site who have Javascript enabled are tracked using Google Analytics. The type of information that Google Analytics collects about you includes data like: the type of Web browser you are using; the type of operating system you are using; your screen resolution; the version of Flash you may be using; your network location and IP address (this can include geographic data like the country, city and state you are in); your Internet connection speed; the time of your visit to the Freedom-School.com site; the pages you visit on the Freedom-School.com site; the amount of time you spend on each page of the Freedom-School.com site and referring site information. In addition to the reports we receive using Google Analytics data, the data is shared with Google. For more information on Google´s privacy policies, visit: http://www.google.com/privacy/ads/
Here is Google´s description of how Google Analytics works and how you can disable it: "Google Analytics collects information anonymously, and much like examining footprints in sand, it reports website trends without identifying individual visitors. Analytics uses its own cookie to track visitor interactions. The cookie is used to store information, such as what time the current visit occurred, whether the visitor has been to the site before, and what site referred the visitor to the web page. Google Analytics customers can view a variety of reports about how visitors interact with their website so they can improve their website and how people find it. A different cookie is used for each website, and visitors are not tracked across multiple sites. Analytics requires that all websites that use it must update their privacy policy to include a notice that fully discloses the use of Analytics. To disable this type of cookie, some browsers will indicate when a cookie is being sent and allow you to decline cookies on a case-by-case basis."

Freedom-School.com site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, or work computers´ DMCA Policy

the Freedom-School.com site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, and/or work computers, make effort to be in compliance with 17 U.S.C. § 512 and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"). It is our policy to respond to any infringement notices and take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") and other applicable intellectual property laws.

If your copyrighted material has been posted on the Freedom-School.com site, the DVD issue, microSDHC card issue, or work computers, in other than fair use capacity or if links to your copyrighted material are returned through our search engine and you want the material removed, you must provide a written communication that details the information listed in the following section. Please be aware that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys´ fees) if you misrepresent information listed on the site that is allegedly infringing on your alleged copyrights. We suggest that you may want to first contact competent legal assistance on this matter.

The following elements must be included in your copyright infringement claim:

* Provide evidence of the authorized person to act on behalf of the fully disclosed alleged owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. Please notice that we generally do not deal with third parties.
* Provide sufficient contact information so that we may contact you. You must also include a valid email address.
* You must identify in sufficient detail the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed and including at least one search term under which the material appears in Freedom-School.com search results.
* A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
* A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
* Must be signed by the authorized person to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly being infringed. (Proper ratification of commencement.)


Send the infringement notice via email to the postmaster at Freedom-School.com

Please allow 1-3 business days for an email response. Note that emailing your complaint to other parties such as our Internet Service Provider (ISP) or server host(s) will not expedite your request and may result in a delayed response due the complaint not being properly being filed.

Presentation Copyright© 2003, 2019
All Rights Reserved
H O M E