The State | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Max Weber defined the "state" in a 1919 lecture in German entitled "Politics as a Vocation" as that which "has a monopoly on the legitimate use of violence." That definition has been highly influential in political science since then, but it is a very European concept, not one that works for the United States or other constitutional republics. See, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_on_the_legitimate_use_of_physical_force In our tradition, it is not the state but the law that authorizes violence, and we the people make the law. Weber used the term "state" to refer collectively to government officials, but in Anglo-American usage the "state" is a people in effective possession of a territory, which may or may not have a government. The primary mechanism for law enforcement is militia, not government professionals. Tyranny can be built on such seemingly subtle distinctions. The Nazi regime was built on the Weber concept. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"But the state lies in all the tongues of good and evil; | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marc Stevens
State created office of person | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Memorandum on the present government of America
U.S.A. The Republic How You Lost It. (Study the whole site.) U.S.A. The Republic is the House
PUBLIC SERVANT QUESTIONNAIREWhen you look around the web, you'll find a public servant questionnaire, but not like this one. I converted it to a single page so you can get a multi-part NCR form made up at Kinkos, Staples, Office Depot, etc.. Keep some by the door to your house and in your glove compartment to give to [any] law enforcement officers who want to ask you questions. Before answering theirs, I can make them answer mine. You'll find supporting law in 5 U.S.C. 552a. By Bob Hurt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NOTICE: Jon Roland, Constitution Society and other mentioned entities are not affiliated with Freedom School. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specialty Areas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
Freedom School information served for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
Freedom School does not consent to unlawful action.
Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable.
Information is intended for those men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and informed compliance.
Freedom School is a free speech site and operation as there is no charge for things presented
this site relys on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.
The noteworthy failure of the government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and third parties affiliated or otherwise. If the government wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements that are not factual appearing on this website are in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. §556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification.
Presentation CopyrightŠ 2007, 2010
All Rights Reserved